Re: V2 [PATCH] PKG_CHECK_MODULES: Check if $pkg_cv_[]$1[]_LIBS works

[Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>]

On 2020-07-28 2:31 p.m., H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> Unlike gdb, binutils should have as few external depecies as possible.
>>> debuginfod brings in some so many external depecies.
>>
>> I'm not a binutils maintainer, so that's not my role to decide about that
>> tradeoff... but we are talking about having an optional (only needed when
>> enabling support for libdebuginfod) *build* dependency on a quite standard
>> tool.  That's not very demanding.
>>
>> If you don't want to deal with libdebuginfod, you can also just build with
>> --without-debuginfod.
> 
> My binutils script had been working fine until pkg.m4 was added

Ok but... that doesn't mean anything.  I think we made it quite clear that the
issue is with your build environment, not the build system (pkg.m4).

>Can it be moved to gdb directory?

It can, but I don't think it would be a good idea.  It would just be confusing
for binutils and GDB to both use libdebuginfod but use different methods of
finding it.  Somebody building binutils + GDB with libdebuginfod support against
a libdebuginfod in a non-default location would have to specify the location of
the library in two different ways.

Simon