From: Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
To: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][gdb/testsuite] Dump /proc/cpuinfo into gdb.log
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 10:32:16 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <671f08cc-cc93-f36e-563d-20f2be20488e@polymtl.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210921080157.GA18967@delia>
On 2021-09-21 4:01 a.m., Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When interpreting the testsuite results, it's often relevant what kind of
> machine the testsuite ran on. On a local machine one can just do
> /proc/cpuinfo, but in case of running tests using a remote system
> that distributes test runs to other remote systems that are not directly
> accessible, that's not possible.
>
> Fix this by dumping /proc/cpuinfo into the gdb.log.
>
> We could do this at the start of each test run, by putting it into unix.exp
> or some such. However, this might be too verbose, so we choose to put it into
> its own test-case, such that it get triggered in a full testrun, but not when
> running one or a subset of tests.
>
> We put the test-case into the gdb.testsuite directory, which is currently the
> only place in the testsuite where we do not test gdb. Though perhaps this
> should be put into a new gdb.info directory, since the test-case doesn't
> actually test the testsuite.
I think in the gdb.testsuite directory is fine.
I like the idea. I even think it would be useful to dump more things
about the system, like:
- "--version" output of compilers used for testing
- "lsb_release -a" output (if lsb_release is available)
- "uname -a" output (if uname is available)
Can you think of more?
Simon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-23 14:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-21 8:01 Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches
2021-09-23 14:32 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches [this message]
2021-09-23 22:06 ` Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches
2021-09-24 12:21 ` Pedro Alves
2021-09-24 12:48 ` Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches
2021-09-24 13:10 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=671f08cc-cc93-f36e-563d-20f2be20488e@polymtl.ca \
--to=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
--cc=tdevries@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox