Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>
To: Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@linaro.org>,
	gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Chris Packham <judge.packham@gmail.com>,
	Luis <luis.machado.foss@gmail.com>, Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>,
	sunilkumar.dora@windriver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] GDB: aarch64-linux: Some header fixes
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2026 11:14:08 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <643ff55e-b906-40e0-aef9-847b1af9a7c1@simark.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260303050641.198127-1-thiago.bauermann@linaro.org>



On 2026-03-03 00:06, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> v4 adds two new patches, reorganizing MTE and SME definitions.
> 
> With this series, I think the AArch64 definitions are correctly organized
> between the headers in gdb/arch/ and gdb/nat/.
> 
> if the series is approved I will propose a version of the last patch for
> the GDB 17 branch which doesn't depend on the previous patches, so that the
> build failure on aarch64-linux-musl can be fixed with minimal changes.
> 
> I didn't include Luis' Approved-by to patches, since they have some changes
> in them.
> 
> I also build-tested this version on aarch64-freebsd14.3 in addition to
> aarch64-linux-gnu and aarch64-linux-musl.
> 
> Previous versions of the patches:
> 
> v1: https://inbox.sourceware.org/gdb-patches/20260211045853.1436881-1-thiago.bauermann@linaro.org/
> v2: https://inbox.sourceware.org/gdb-patches/20260214045504.361392-1-thiago.bauermann@linaro.org/
> v3: https://inbox.sourceware.org/gdb-patches/20260217060106.1906312-1-thiago.bauermann@linaro.org/

I skimmed the code and read the commit messages, it looks good to me,
but I will leave Luis give the approval.  Thanks for the cleanup, I
think things are organized in a systematic and predictable way now.

Here are some things that copilot had to say, I checked and they seemed
true:

 - gdb/nat/aarch64-pauth-linux.h: HWCAP_PACA is defined unconditionally,
   unlike every other HWCAP fallback in the series (HWCAP2_MTE,
   HWCAP2_FPMR, HWCAP2_SME, HWCAP_GCS) which all use #ifndef guards. On
   any modern aarch64 Linux system HWCAP_PACA is already defined by
   <asm/hwcap.h>, so including this header after any header that pulls
   it in will cause a redefinition error. Wrap it in #ifndef HWCAP_PACA
   / #endif.

   (Simon: not sure it will necessarily be a error, I think it's possible to
   redefine macros if they have exactly the same value, but still it
   would be good to add the #ifndef.)

 - FPMR: the commit message appears to be a copy-paste of the pauth one
   that wasn't updated — it references AARCH64_HWCAP2_FPRM, HWCAP2_FPRM,
   and gdb/arch/aarch64-pauth-linux.h / gdb/nat/aarch64-pauth-linux.h,
   when all four should refer to the FPMR variants.

   (Simon: notice the FPRM -> FPMR typos in there)

 - GCS: the commit message says "create
   gdb/nat/aarch64-gcs-linux-ptrace.h" but the file actually created is
   gdb/nat/aarch64-gcs-linux.h.

Simon

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-03-03 16:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-03  5:06 Thiago Jung Bauermann
2026-03-03  5:06 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] GDB: Add aarch64-pauth-linux.h to gdb/arch/ and gdb/nat/ Thiago Jung Bauermann
2026-03-03 15:51   ` Simon Marchi
2026-03-04  4:04     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2026-03-10 14:18       ` Luis
2026-03-04  3:59   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2026-03-03  5:06 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] GDB: Add aarch64-fpmr-linux.h " Thiago Jung Bauermann
2026-03-04  4:14   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2026-03-10 14:14     ` Luis
2026-03-03  5:06 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] GDB: aarch64-linux: Reorganize MTE-related definitions Thiago Jung Bauermann
2026-03-04  4:17   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2026-03-10 14:12     ` Luis
2026-03-03  5:06 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] GDB: aarch64-linux: Reorganize SME-related definitions Thiago Jung Bauermann
2026-03-04  4:21   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2026-03-10 14:07     ` Luis
2026-03-03  5:06 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] GDB: aarch64-linux: Reorganize GCS-related definitions Thiago Jung Bauermann
2026-03-04  4:27   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2026-03-10 14:05     ` Luis
2026-03-03  5:06 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] GDB: aarch64-linux: Fix build failure on musl systems Thiago Jung Bauermann
2026-03-03 16:14 ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2026-03-04  3:52   ` [PATCH v4 0/6] GDB: aarch64-linux: Some header fixes Thiago Jung Bauermann
2026-03-10 14:19     ` Luis
2026-03-17  2:29       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2026-03-17  2:49         ` Simon Marchi
2026-03-17 23:43           ` Thiago Jung Bauermann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=643ff55e-b906-40e0-aef9-847b1af9a7c1@simark.ca \
    --to=simark@simark.ca \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=judge.packham@gmail.com \
    --cc=luis.machado.foss@gmail.com \
    --cc=sunilkumar.dora@windriver.com \
    --cc=thiago.bauermann@linaro.org \
    --cc=tom@tromey.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox