From: Walfred Tedeschi <walfred.tedeschi@intel.com>
To: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>
Cc: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>,
gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 2/2] Add mpx-bnd-init-on-return set/show command for inferior calls.
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 15:38:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <571F8B5C.8070003@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86potcflcw.fsf@gmail.com>
Am 4/26/2016 um 5:19 PM schrieb Yao Qi:
> Walfred Tedeschi <walfred.tedeschi@intel.com> writes:
>
>> When using the return command, execution of a function is aborted
>> and present values are returned from that point. That can cause
>> bound violations in the MPX context. To avoid such side-effects,
>> a new setting ("mpx-bnd-init-on-return") was added to control
>> the initialization of bound register when using the return command.
>>
>
> We need to investigate why does "return" cause bound violations. If the
> violations are caused by the invalid or garbage return value, that is
> expected, and it is a correct behavior to me. If the return value is
> out of the bounds of registers settings, the violation is caused. Can we
> tweak GDB to adjust the register settings to allow these memory accesses
> in the "return"?
>
Yao,
Thanks again for the prompt review! :)
The "return" causes a premature exit from the function. BND is only
returning the bounds of the pointer which is returned in the usual way.
The novelty here is the BND registers. In case we are returning a
pointer or address BND0 will carry the bounds of the pointer being
returned. Once it is not set yet than garbage will be returned instead.
In this way the value is wrong and a bound violations is likely to happen.
Regards,
-Fred
Intel Deutschland GmbH
Registered Address: Am Campeon 10-12, 85579 Neubiberg, Germany
Tel: +49 89 99 8853-0, www.intel.de
Managing Directors: Christin Eisenschmid, Christian Lamprechter
Chairperson of the Supervisory Board: Nicole Lau
Registered Office: Munich
Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 186928
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-26 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-18 14:21 Walfred Tedeschi
2016-03-18 15:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-04-26 15:20 ` Yao Qi
2016-04-26 15:38 ` Walfred Tedeschi [this message]
[not found] ` <572749D2.5040106@intel.com>
2016-06-13 15:18 ` Tedeschi, Walfred
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=571F8B5C.8070003@intel.com \
--to=walfred.tedeschi@intel.com \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox