From: Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>,
Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>,
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Laurent <Laurent.Morichetti@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] gdb: change regcache list to be a map
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 16:25:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56bd04f4-1c55-ab51-e80e-d320858a5d47@simark.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <27f7abde-0118-efee-6001-6b4b8f2d46a8@palves.net>
On 2020-08-05 2:02 p.m., Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 7/30/20 6:03 PM, Simon Marchi wrote:
>> On 2020-07-30 12:58 p.m., Simon Marchi wrote:
>>> It's down to:
>>>
>>> for (auto it = regcaches.begin (); it != regcaches.end ();)
>>> {
>>> if (it->second->target () == target)
>>> it = regcaches.erase (it);
>>> else
>>> it++;
>>> }
>> Ah, I see that you've provided me a patch for that too (I thought you only
>> did the multi-level map thing).
> Note that it's idiomatic to write ++it instead of it++, to avoid
> creating a temporary. It's possible that compilers nowadays optimize
> it away, but it still looks odd to not write ++it to me.
Ack.
>
> Your code is:
>> for (auto it = regcaches.begin (); it != regcaches.end ();)
>> {
>> if (it->second->target () == target)
>> {
>> delete it->second;
>> it = regcaches.erase (it);
>> }
>> }
>>
>> I think you are missing an it++ in the else? Otherwise, when the target doesn't
>> match, we'll get into an infinite loop I presume.
> Yes, I was. I didn't notice because I jumped straight to the multi-map
> patch on top, which deletes that code, IIRC.
>
Thanks.
Simon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-05 20:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-20 20:40 [PATCH 0/4] Regcache fix and optimization Simon Marchi
2020-07-20 20:40 ` [PATCH 1/4] gdb: rename regcache::current_regcache to regcache::regcaches Simon Marchi
2020-07-23 20:01 ` Pedro Alves
2020-07-20 20:40 ` [PATCH 2/4] gdb: move regcache::regcaches to regcache.c Simon Marchi
2020-07-23 20:03 ` Pedro Alves
2020-07-20 20:41 ` [PATCH 3/4] gdb: pass target to thread_ptid_changed observable Simon Marchi
2020-07-23 20:42 ` Pedro Alves
2020-07-30 15:27 ` Simon Marchi
2020-08-05 14:50 ` Pedro Alves
2020-08-05 19:08 ` Simon Marchi
2020-08-05 22:29 ` Pedro Alves
2020-07-20 20:41 ` [PATCH 4/4] gdb: change regcache list to be a map Simon Marchi
2020-07-24 1:53 ` Pedro Alves
2020-07-24 16:59 ` John Baldwin
2020-07-30 16:26 ` Simon Marchi
2020-07-30 16:58 ` Simon Marchi
2020-07-30 17:03 ` Simon Marchi
2020-08-05 18:02 ` Pedro Alves
2020-08-05 20:25 ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2020-07-30 17:07 ` Simon Marchi
2020-07-30 18:17 ` Simon Marchi
2020-08-05 18:14 ` Pedro Alves
2020-08-10 19:15 ` Tom Tromey
2020-08-10 19:25 ` Simon Marchi
2020-08-12 12:52 ` Tom Tromey
2020-08-12 15:17 ` Tom Tromey
2020-08-06 20:27 ` [PATCH 0/4] Regcache fix and optimization Simon Marchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56bd04f4-1c55-ab51-e80e-d320858a5d47@simark.ca \
--to=simark@simark.ca \
--cc=Laurent.Morichetti@amd.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=pedro@palves.net \
--cc=simon.marchi@efficios.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox