From: Antoine Tremblay <antoine.tremblay@ericsson.com>
To: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>
Cc: <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] Add support for ARM breakpoint types in GDBServer.
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 21:26:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5609B069.6010200@ericsson.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8637xy96qx.fsf@gmail.com>
On 09/28/2015 06:29 AM, Yao Qi wrote:
> Antoine Tremblay <antoine.tremblay@ericsson.com> writes:
>
>> gdb/ChangeLog:
>> * Makefile.in: Add arm-common.o.
>> * arm-tdep.c (thumb_insn_size): Move to arm-common.h/c.
>
> "Move to arm-common.c". Some macros are moved, we should mention the
> move here as well.
Done.
>
>> * common/arm-common.c: New file.
>> * common/arm-common.h: New file.
>
> arm-common.c is not a good file name to me, how about arm-insn.c?
This will contain more stuff as I post the next patch sets for single
stepping etc.. I would like to keep a more general name.
It's basically all coming from arm-tdep.c but I don't want to name it
common/arm-tdep.c to avoid confusion and Makefile problems.
arm-ctdep.c ?
> Please move this file to arch/ directory rather than common/
It seems weird to me to have common objects somewhere else then in
common/ , if common becomes more a lib we don't want it all over the
place no ?
Would creating a common/arch be acceptable ? I guess we would have to
move things like x86-xstate.h etc.. there too ?
>
>> * configure.tgt: Add arm-common.o.
>> * gdbserver/Makefile.in: Add arm-common.c/o.
>
> ChangeLog entries for GDBserver should be written separately.
Oops my bad sorry about that.
>
>> * gdbserver/configure.srv: Add arm-common.o.
>> * gdbserver/linux-arm-low.c (arm_breakpoint_at): Adjust for
>> breakpoint types.
>> (arm_breakpoint_from_pc): New function.
>
> arm_breakpoint_from_pc is not a new function, but arm_is_thumb_mode is.
>
Done.
>> diff --git a/gdb/common/arm-common.c b/gdb/common/arm-common.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..861b249
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/gdb/common/arm-common.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
>> +/* Common code for generic ARM support.
>> +
>> + Copyright (C) 2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>> +
>
> Contents in file are moved from existing file, so we should still keep
> the year range of the original file. It should be
>
> Copyright (C) 1988-2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>
>
OK np
>> diff --git a/gdb/configure.tgt b/gdb/configure.tgt
>> index c42b4df..e831f59 100644
>> --- a/gdb/configure.tgt
>> +++ b/gdb/configure.tgt
>> @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ arm*-wince-pe | arm*-*-mingw32ce*)
>> ;;
>> arm*-*-linux*)
>> # Target: ARM based machine running GNU/Linux
>> - gdb_target_obs="arm-tdep.o arm-linux-tdep.o glibc-tdep.o \
>> + gdb_target_obs="arm-common.o arm-tdep.o arm-linux-tdep.o glibc-tdep.o \
>> solib-svr4.o symfile-mem.o linux-tdep.o linux-record.o"
>> build_gdbserver=yes
>
> since arm-common.o is moved out of arm-tdep.o, so it should be added to
> every target which uses arm-tdep.o, such as aarch64*-*-linux*,
> arm*-wince-pe, etc.
Even if they don't use it ? But ok.
>
>> diff --git a/gdb/gdbserver/linux-arm-low.c b/gdb/gdbserver/linux-arm-low.c
>> index 367c704..15ecb70 100644
>> --- a/gdb/gdbserver/linux-arm-low.c
>> +++ b/gdb/gdbserver/linux-arm-low.c
>> @@ -30,6 +30,8 @@
>> #include "nat/gdb_ptrace.h"
>> #include <signal.h>
>>
>> +#include "common/arm-common.h"
>> +
>> /* Defined in auto-generated files. */
>> void init_registers_arm (void);
>> extern const struct target_desc *tdesc_arm;
>> @@ -234,19 +236,28 @@ arm_set_pc (struct regcache *regcache, CORE_ADDR pc)
>> }
>>
>> /* Correct in either endianness. */
>> -static const unsigned long arm_breakpoint = 0xef9f0001;
>> -#define arm_breakpoint_len 4
>> -static const unsigned short thumb_breakpoint = 0xde01;
>> -static const unsigned short thumb2_breakpoint[] = { 0xf7f0, 0xa000 };
>> +#define arm_abi_breakpoint 0xef9f0001UL
>>
>> /* For new EABI binaries. We recognize it regardless of which ABI
>> is used for gdbserver, so single threaded debugging should work
>> OK, but for multi-threaded debugging we only insert the current
>> ABI's breakpoint instruction. For now at least. */
>> -static const unsigned long arm_eabi_breakpoint = 0xe7f001f0;
>> +#define arm_eabi_breakpoint 0xe7f001f0UL
>> +
>> +#ifndef __ARM_EABI__
>> +static const unsigned long arm_breakpoint = arm_abi_breakpoint;
>> +#else
>> +static const unsigned long arm_breakpoint = arm_eabi_breakpoint;
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +#define arm_breakpoint_len 4
>> +static const unsigned short thumb_breakpoint = 0xde01;
>> +#define thumb_breakpoint_len 2
>> +static const unsigned short thumb2_breakpoint[] = { 0xf7f0, 0xa000 };
>> +#define thumb2_breakpoint_len 4
>
> I am confused by your changes here. Why do you change them?
>
Before arm_breakpoint_from_pc would be :
#ifndef __ARM_EABI__
return (const unsigned char *) &arm_breakpoint;
#else
- return (const unsigned char *) &arm_eabi_breakpoint;
#endif
And arm_breakpoint_at would check for the arm_breakpoint ||
arm_eabi_breakpoint.
Thus the selected arm_breakpoint would be what that function returned
and arm_breakpoint was arm_abi_breakpoint.
It felt more clear to me to name those for what they are : 2 separate
entities arm_abi_breakpoint and arm_eabi_breakpoint and set the current
used one as arm_breakpoint.
This allows a cleaner breakpoint_from_pc as it just returns
arm_breakpoint rather than having the #ifdef in that function.
Any other reference to the arm_breakpoint would also be clear of #ifdefs...
>>
>> static int
>> -arm_breakpoint_at (CORE_ADDR where)
>> +arm_is_thumb_mode (void)
>> {
>> struct regcache *regcache = get_thread_regcache (current_thread, 1);
>> unsigned long cpsr;
>> @@ -254,6 +265,17 @@ arm_breakpoint_at (CORE_ADDR where)
>> collect_register_by_name (regcache, "cpsr", &cpsr);
>>
>> if (cpsr & 0x20)
>> + return 1;
>> + else
>> + return 0;
>
> Indentation looks odd.
Done.
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Returns 1 if there is a software breakpoint at location. */
>> +
>> +static int
>> +arm_breakpoint_at (CORE_ADDR where)
>> +{
>> + if (arm_is_thumb_mode ())
>> {
>> /* Thumb mode. */
>> unsigned short insn;
>> @@ -275,7 +297,7 @@ arm_breakpoint_at (CORE_ADDR where)
>> unsigned long insn;
>>
>> (*the_target->read_memory) (where, (unsigned char *) &insn, 4);
>> - if (insn == arm_breakpoint)
>> + if (insn == arm_abi_breakpoint)
>> return 1;
>>
>> if (insn == arm_eabi_breakpoint)
>> @@ -285,6 +307,53 @@ arm_breakpoint_at (CORE_ADDR where)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +/* Determine the type and size of breakpoint to insert at PCPTR. Uses
>> + the program counter value to determine whether a 16-bit or 32-bit
>> + breakpoint should be used. It returns a pointer to a string of
>> + bytes that encode a breakpoint instruction, stores the length of
>> + the string to *lenptr, and adjusts the program counter (if
>> + necessary) to point to the actual memory location where the
>> + breakpoint should be inserted. */
>> +
>> +static const unsigned char *
>> +arm_breakpoint_from_pc (CORE_ADDR *pcptr, int *lenptr)
>> +{
>> + /* Default if no pc is set to arm breakpoint. */
>> + if (pcptr == NULL)
>
> Such NULL checking is no longer needed, right?
>
Indeed this is gone based on comments in patch 1/5.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-28 21:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-18 12:02 [PATCH 0/5] Software breakpoints support for ARM linux Antoine Tremblay
2015-09-18 12:02 ` [PATCH 2/5] Make breakpoint and breakpoint_len local variables in GDBServer Antoine Tremblay
2015-09-28 9:55 ` Yao Qi
2015-09-28 10:05 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-09-28 21:01 ` Antoine Tremblay
2015-09-28 20:59 ` Antoine Tremblay
2015-09-18 12:03 ` [PATCH 4/5] Handle breakpoint kinds for software breakpoints " Antoine Tremblay
2015-09-28 10:33 ` Yao Qi
2015-09-29 11:55 ` Antoine Tremblay
2015-09-18 12:03 ` [PATCH 3/5] Add support for ARM breakpoint types " Antoine Tremblay
2015-09-28 10:29 ` Yao Qi
2015-09-28 21:26 ` Antoine Tremblay [this message]
2015-09-29 8:32 ` Yao Qi
2015-09-29 11:38 ` Antoine Tremblay
2015-09-29 11:43 ` Yao Qi
2015-09-18 12:03 ` [PATCH 1/5] Support multiple breakpoint types per target " Antoine Tremblay
2015-09-23 10:51 ` Yao Qi
2015-09-23 12:37 ` Antoine Tremblay
2015-09-23 14:46 ` Yao Qi
2015-09-23 14:56 ` Antoine Tremblay
2015-09-18 12:03 ` [PATCH 5/5] Support software breakpoints for ARM linux " Antoine Tremblay
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5609B069.6010200@ericsson.com \
--to=antoine.tremblay@ericsson.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox