From: Don Breazeal <donb@codesourcery.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>,
"Breazeal, Don" <Don_Breazeal@mentor.com>,
"gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [pushed][PATCH v3 3/4] Extended-remote exec test
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 15:53:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55F83EE1.5080903@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55F83D18.709@redhat.com>
On 9/15/2015 8:45 AM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> Hi Don,
>
> On 09/11/2015 07:38 PM, Don Breazeal wrote:
>> gdb_breakpoint [gdb_get_line_number "break-here"]
>> - gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "break-here" ".* break-here .*"
>> + gdb_test_multiple "continue" "continue to breakpoint" {
>> + -re ".*Breakpoint.*break-here.*" {
>> + pass "continue to breakpoint"
>> + }
>> + }
>>
>
> This change is causing a regression. Was there a reason for it?
> AFAICS, none of the other non-ldr-exc-*.exp files got this change.
No, I intended to revert that change, which I did for the other
non-ldr-exc-* files. You had pointed out that the change introduced
a race.
>
> Fix below.
>
> From 5cd484be64e40d0423cc7fe8d8355421e4da1fff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 16:32:19 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] Fix gdb.threads/non-ldr-exc-3.exp race
>
> gdb.threads/non-ldr-exc-3.exp is sometimes failing like this:
>
> [Switching to Thread 6831.6832]
>
> Breakpoint 2, thread_execler (arg=0x0) at /home/pedro/gdb/mygit/build/../src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/non-ldr-exc-3.c:41
> 41 if (execl (image, image, argv1, NULL) == -1) /* break-here */
> PASS: gdb.threads/non-ldr-exc-3.exp: lock-sched=on,non-stop=off: continue to breakpoint
> (gdb) set scheduler-locking on
> (gdb) FAIL: gdb.threads/non-ldr-exc-3.exp: lock-sched=on,non-stop=off: set scheduler-locking on
>
> The problem is that the gdb_test_multiple is missing the prompt
> anchor. The problem was introduced by 2fd33e9448. This reverts the
> hunk that introduced the problem, reverting back to
> gdb_continue_to_breakpoint.
>
> gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> 2015-09-15 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
>
> * gdb.threads/non-ldr-exc-3.exp (do_test): Use
> gdb_continue_to_breakpoint instead of gdb_test_multiple.
> ---
> gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/non-ldr-exc-3.exp | 6 +-----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/non-ldr-exc-3.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/non-ldr-exc-3.exp
> index 3e7a3a1..188b825 100644
> --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/non-ldr-exc-3.exp
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/non-ldr-exc-3.exp
> @@ -45,11 +45,7 @@ proc do_test { lock_sched nonstop } {
> }
>
> gdb_breakpoint [gdb_get_line_number "break-here"]
> - gdb_test_multiple "continue" "continue to breakpoint" {
> - -re ".*Breakpoint.*break-here.*" {
> - pass "continue to breakpoint"
> - }
> - }
> + gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "break-here" ".* break-here .*"
>
> # Also test with sched-lock to make sure we can follow the
> # non-leader thread execing even though the main thread wasn't
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-15 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-15 21:49 [PATCH 0/5] Extended-remote follow exec Don Breazeal
2015-07-15 21:50 ` [PATCH 3/5] Extended-remote support for exec event tests Don Breazeal
2015-07-15 21:50 ` [PATCH 2/5] Extended-remote exec catchpoints Don Breazeal
2015-08-13 15:00 ` Pedro Alves
2015-07-15 21:50 ` [PATCH 1/5] Extended-remote exec events Don Breazeal
2015-07-16 14:01 ` Yao Qi
2015-07-16 15:52 ` Don Breazeal
2015-07-16 16:35 ` Yao Qi
2015-07-16 17:06 ` Don Breazeal
2015-07-17 11:55 ` Yao Qi
2015-07-15 21:51 ` [PATCH 5/5] Extended-remote exec event docs Don Breazeal
2015-07-16 2:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-07-15 21:51 ` [PATCH 4/5] Eliminate spurious warnings from remote exec Don Breazeal
2015-07-30 23:19 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Extended-remote exec events Don Breazeal
2015-07-30 23:19 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] Extended-remote follow exec Don Breazeal
2015-08-13 14:50 ` Pedro Alves
2015-07-30 23:19 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] Extended-remote exec catchpoints Don Breazeal
2015-07-30 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] Eliminate spurious warnings from remote exec Don Breazeal
2015-08-13 15:38 ` Pedro Alves
2015-07-30 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] Extended-remote exec event docs Don Breazeal
2015-07-31 6:36 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-07-31 17:06 ` Don Breazeal
2015-08-13 15:43 ` Pedro Alves
2015-07-30 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] Extended-remote support for exec event tests Don Breazeal
2015-08-13 15:22 ` Pedro Alves
2015-09-09 23:05 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] Extended-remote exec events Don Breazeal
2015-09-09 23:06 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] Extended-remote support for exec event tests Don Breazeal
2015-09-10 13:26 ` Pedro Alves
2015-09-09 23:06 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] Extended-remote exec catchpoints Don Breazeal
2015-09-09 23:06 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] Extended-remote exec event docs Don Breazeal
2015-09-10 15:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-09-09 23:06 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] Extended-remote follow exec Don Breazeal
[not found] ` <55F17AFA.5080102@redhat.com>
2015-09-10 22:56 ` Don Breazeal
2015-09-10 23:00 ` Don Breazeal
2015-09-11 8:34 ` Pedro Alves
2015-09-11 18:38 ` [pushed][PATCH " Don Breazeal
2015-09-11 18:38 ` [pushed][PATCH v3 2/4] Extended-remote exec catchpoints Don Breazeal
2015-09-11 18:38 ` [pushed][PATCH v3 3/4] Extended-remote exec test Don Breazeal
2015-09-15 15:45 ` Pedro Alves
2015-09-15 15:53 ` Don Breazeal [this message]
2015-09-15 15:58 ` Pedro Alves
2015-09-15 16:00 ` Breazeal, Don
2015-09-15 16:28 ` Pedro Alves
2015-09-11 18:39 ` [pushed][PATCH v3 4/4] Extended-remote exec event docs Don Breazeal
2015-09-15 8:56 ` [pushed][PATCH v3 1/4] Extended-remote follow exec Yao Qi
2015-09-15 16:12 ` Don Breazeal
2015-09-15 16:31 ` Yao Qi
2015-09-30 16:20 ` Pedro Alves
2015-09-30 16:22 ` Breazeal, Don
2016-12-08 11:54 ` Thomas Schwinge
2017-02-17 16:45 ` Pedro Alves
2019-02-14 16:42 ` Thomas Schwinge
2019-02-14 17:26 ` Tom Tromey
2019-02-14 23:11 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55F83EE1.5080903@codesourcery.com \
--to=donb@codesourcery.com \
--cc=Don_Breazeal@mentor.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox