From: Masaki Muranaka <monaka@monami-software.com>
To: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
Cc: nickc@redhat.com, drow@false.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
binutils@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Can't set architecture to m32c on m32c-elf-gdb.
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 00:02:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55B67174-01F1-4A30-B65B-32A10B0EC7EB@monami-software.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201001072244.o07Mintk025541@greed.delorie.com>
Hello DJ,
Yes some series cores are already shipped it and some are still planning.
I didn't say R32C is same as M32C. But I think their register sets
and periherals are quite similar.
And Renesas says R32C is the high end model of M16C/M32C series, right?
I agree RX is completely different opcode/registers from M16C family.
("RX is a step up from R32C. " is similar to "SH-1/2 is a step up from H8")
So I have no view about RX supports on GNU chains.
Thanks,
On 2010/01/08, at 7:44, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
>> Renesas is planning to ship R32C series.
>
> They're already shipping it. It's as different from M32C as M32C is
> from M16C (m16c/60 at least) - no opcode compatibility at all, aside
> from a "passing resemblance" at the asm syntax level.
>
> M16C vs R8C is much closer; they differ only in two opcodes. M16C/80
> vs M32C/80 have the same architecture, but m32c has more opcodes.
>
> RX is a step up from R32C. Same peripherals, basically, but
> completely different opcodes and register set.
>
--
Masaki Muranaka
Monami software
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-08 0:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-03 9:17 Masaki Muranaka
2008-12-03 14:08 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-12-04 1:04 ` Masaki Muranaka
2008-12-04 4:27 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-12-04 6:48 ` Masaki Muranaka
2008-12-04 13:13 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-12-04 14:22 ` Pedro Alves
2008-12-05 0:29 ` Masaki Muranaka
2009-12-28 2:32 ` Masaki Muranaka
2009-12-31 12:22 ` Nick Clifton
2010-01-03 0:00 ` Masaki Muranaka
2010-01-06 8:18 ` [patch] " Masaki Muranaka
2010-01-06 15:17 ` Nick Clifton
2010-01-06 23:24 ` Masaki Muranaka
2010-01-07 15:54 ` Nick Clifton
2010-01-07 22:38 ` Masaki Muranaka
2010-01-07 22:45 ` DJ Delorie
2010-01-08 0:02 ` Masaki Muranaka [this message]
2010-01-08 0:07 ` DJ Delorie
2010-01-08 0:45 ` Masaki Muranaka
2010-01-08 11:40 ` Nick Clifton
2010-01-12 0:04 ` Masaki Muranaka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55B67174-01F1-4A30-B65B-32A10B0EC7EB@monami-software.com \
--to=monaka@monami-software.com \
--cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
--cc=dj@redhat.com \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=nickc@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox