From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Cc: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>,
gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
Phil Muldoon <pmuldoon@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [patchv2] compile: Fix crash on cv-qualified self-reference
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 16:16:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5594126B.2060200@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150701160713.GA26015@host1.jankratochvil.net>
On 07/01/2015 05:07 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Jul 2015 17:35:10 +0200, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> On 07/01/2015 04:29 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
>>> From 1 mandatory macro 3 mandatory macros and breaking all 3rd party patches.
>>> When GDB codebase finally gets compiled by clang++ I agree it will be an
>>> improvement.
>>
>> Seriously, that's a depressing and demotivating comment.
>> You want it done, but you also want it not done.
>
> Do you mean the first sentence or the second sentence?
>
The whole of it. If we had converted to pure C++ in one go, you'd have
had to revolve the same conflicts too. And the conflicts resulting from
the final conversion from TRY/CATCH to native try/catch will be super
trivial to resolve, as that won't move code around.
> I agree the first sentence is demotivating but I feel the same spending a lot
> of time rebasing patches again and again on changes that end up half-way or
> that are questionable whether they really cleaned up the code. Although
> specifically for this TRY_CATCH->TRY case I had fortunately only two such
> cases.
And still, you complain.
This is truly pointless. Sorry, I'm out of here.
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-01 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-18 17:28 [patch] " Jan Kratochvil
2015-05-16 13:26 ` [patchv2] " Jan Kratochvil
2015-06-30 19:57 ` Joel Brobecker
2015-07-01 10:32 ` Pedro Alves
2015-07-01 11:21 ` Yao Qi
2015-07-01 13:24 ` Jan Kratochvil
2015-07-01 13:54 ` Pedro Alves
2015-07-01 14:10 ` Jan Kratochvil
2015-07-01 14:59 ` Pedro Alves
2015-07-01 15:12 ` Jan Kratochvil
2015-07-01 15:24 ` Pedro Alves
2015-07-01 15:29 ` Jan Kratochvil
2015-07-01 15:35 ` Pedro Alves
2015-07-01 16:07 ` Jan Kratochvil
2015-07-01 16:16 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2015-07-01 14:06 ` Yao Qi
2015-07-02 12:34 ` Jan Kratochvil
2015-07-04 17:11 ` [patchv3] " Jan Kratochvil
2015-07-08 9:29 ` Pedro Alves
2015-07-08 12:51 ` [commit] " Jan Kratochvil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5594126B.2060200@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=pmuldoon@redhat.com \
--cc=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox