Re: [PATCH v7 7/7] Extended-remote follow fork documentation

["Breazeal, Don" <donb@codesourcery.com>]

On 4/10/2015 10:56 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> From: Don Breazeal <donb@codesourcery.com>
>> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 10:09:46 -0700
>>

> 
>> +@cindex fork events, remote reply
>> +@item fork
>> +The packet indicates that @code{fork} was called, and @var{r}
> 
> What does that @var{r} refer to?  The previous text mentions
> @var{n}:@var{r} pairs, but there's no @var{n} in this description, so
> it doesn't seem to fit.  What am I missing?

Maybe I'm the one who is missing something.  I thought that the @var{n}
was implied by '@item fork', because of this text above:

  If @var{n} is a recognized @dfn{stop reason},

In this case @var{n} is a stop reason.  Subsequently '@item fork' is in
this table:

  The currently defined stop reasons are:

  @table @samp

I pretty much just copied what had been done for shared library events
in the same table.  Should I do this differently?  I see that swbreak
and hwbreak aren't the same as the other items.

Thanks
--Don