From: Daniel Colascione <dancol@dancol.org>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Warn users about mismatched PID namespaces
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 12:51:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5452345D.4040601@dancol.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <545233C8.4070402@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1231 bytes --]
On 10/30/2014 12:49 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 10/30/2014 12:32 PM, Daniel Colascione wrote:
>> On 10/30/2014 12:23 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
>>> On 10/30/2014 03:07 AM, Daniel Colascione wrote:
>>>
>>>> diff --git a/gdb/linux-thread-db.c b/gdb/linux-thread-db.c
>>>> index 352fac1..4089417 100644
>>>> - --- a/gdb/linux-thread-db.c
>>>> +++ b/gdb/linux-thread-db.c
>>>> @@ -1223,6 +1223,25 @@ thread_db_new_objfile (struct objfile *objfile)
>>>> static void
>>>> thread_db_inferior_created (struct target_ops *target, int from_tty)
>>>> {
>>>> + /* If the child is in a different PID namespace, its idea of its PID
>>>> + will differ from our idea of its PID. When we scan the child's
>>>> + thread list, we'll mistakenly think it has no threads since the
>>>> + thread PID fields won't match the PID we give to
>>>> + libthread_db. */
>>>
>>> Why not give libthread_db the right PID then?
>>
>> How do you suggest find it?
>
> Isn't it visible somewhere in /proc ?
Not AFAICT, but maybe I overlooked something.
>
>> There's some talk on LKML of adding the necessary system call, but it's not in-tree yet.
>
> Do you have a url handy?
https://lwn.net/Articles/602987/
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-30 12:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-30 3:09 Daniel Colascione
2014-10-30 12:23 ` Pedro Alves
2014-10-30 12:32 ` Daniel Colascione
2014-10-30 12:49 ` Pedro Alves
2014-10-30 12:51 ` Daniel Colascione [this message]
2014-10-30 13:12 ` Pedro Alves
2014-10-30 13:13 ` Pedro Alves
2014-10-30 15:41 ` Daniel Colascione
2014-10-30 16:18 ` Pedro Alves
2014-11-05 10:55 ` Pedro Alves
2014-11-06 21:12 ` Daniel Colascione
2014-11-07 12:50 ` Pedro Alves
2014-11-07 12:49 ` Pedro Alves
2014-11-09 21:23 ` Daniel Colascione
2014-11-11 14:25 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5452345D.4040601@dancol.org \
--to=dancol@dancol.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox