From: Pierre Langlois <pierre.langlois@embecosm.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [PATCH][PR breakpoints/16606] AVR8 breakpoint out of range, decrement pc after break
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 19:50:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <531A2316.5090507@embecosm.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1227 bytes --]
Firstly, this patch fixes issuing breakpoints using an address
expression on AVR.
For example:
(gdb) break *0x10e
would result in a breakpoint at the address 0x80010e, out of range.
AVR is an harvard architecture and we use the top bits of the internal
addresses to determine whether this is a code address or a data address.
In this case, 0x800000 was applied to this address because it was
considered to be a data address. A more detailed explanation of this
behaviour can be found on bugzilla:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16606#c1
When returning a struct value from the evaluation of *0x10e, nothing in
this value indicates that it resides in code space. In this case the
expression is a linespec, referring to source code, so we can safely
assume the address is in code space. We can set the TYPE_CODE_SPACE
instance flag on the type of the value. When the value is converted to
an address, gdbarch_integer_to_address can apply the correct mask
depending on TYPE_CODE_SPACE.
This fix unveiled another issue, the program counter was not decremented
after hitting the breakpoint instruction.
This patch fixes this by adding gdbarch_decr_pc_after_break to AVR's
gdbarch.
Best,
Pierre
[-- Attachment #2: pr-breakpoint-16606.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1967 bytes --]
diff --git a/gdb/avr-tdep.c b/gdb/avr-tdep.c
index 6e58f04..a4a4a6d 100644
--- a/gdb/avr-tdep.c
+++ b/gdb/avr-tdep.c
@@ -333,7 +333,10 @@ avr_integer_to_address (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
{
ULONGEST addr = unpack_long (type, buf);
- return avr_make_saddr (addr);
+ if (TYPE_CODE_SPACE (type))
+ return avr_make_iaddr (addr);
+ else
+ return avr_make_saddr (addr);
}
static CORE_ADDR
@@ -1436,6 +1439,7 @@ avr_gdbarch_init (struct gdbarch_info info, struct gdbarch_list *arches)
set_gdbarch_inner_than (gdbarch, core_addr_lessthan);
set_gdbarch_breakpoint_from_pc (gdbarch, avr_breakpoint_from_pc);
+ set_gdbarch_decr_pc_after_break (gdbarch, 2);
frame_unwind_append_unwinder (gdbarch, &avr_frame_unwind);
frame_base_set_default (gdbarch, &avr_frame_base);
diff --git a/gdb/linespec.c b/gdb/linespec.c
index 610809d..8355114 100644
--- a/gdb/linespec.c
+++ b/gdb/linespec.c
@@ -2588,6 +2588,7 @@ initialize_defaults (struct symtab **default_symtab, int *default_line)
static CORE_ADDR
linespec_expression_to_pc (const char **exp_ptr)
{
+ struct value *val;
if (current_program_space->executing_startup)
/* The error message doesn't really matter, because this case
should only hit during breakpoint reset. */
@@ -2595,7 +2596,14 @@ linespec_expression_to_pc (const char **exp_ptr)
"program space is in startup"));
(*exp_ptr)++;
- return value_as_address (parse_to_comma_and_eval (exp_ptr));
+ val = parse_to_comma_and_eval (exp_ptr);
+ /* The value given by parse_to_comma_and_eval is an address but does not have
+ any information about the address space in which it resides. Harvard
+ architectures need to know this when converting a value to an address with
+ gdbarch_integer_to_address. It is safe to assume linespecs give an address
+ in code space. */
+ TYPE_INSTANCE_FLAGS (value_type (val)) |= TYPE_INSTANCE_FLAG_CODE_SPACE;
+ return value_as_address (val);
}
\f
next reply other threads:[~2014-03-07 19:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-07 19:50 Pierre Langlois [this message]
2014-03-10 9:23 ` Pierre Langlois
2014-03-10 11:08 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-03-10 17:07 ` Pedro Alves
2014-03-11 11:58 ` Pierre Langlois
2014-03-12 8:08 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-03-13 14:05 ` Pierre Langlois
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=531A2316.5090507@embecosm.com \
--to=pierre.langlois@embecosm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox