Re: [RFC v2] fix regressions with target-async

[Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>]

On 02/28/2014 06:26 PM, Tom Tromey wrote:
>>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> writes:
> 
> Pedro> Looks like a nice solution to me.  I'm happy to see the
> Pedro> find_default_...  default methods disappear.
> 
> FAOD there is still find_default_supports_disable_randomization.
> I think this is fixable, but it wasn't related to the bug at hand.
> 
> Pedro> But this looks bogus to me -- it's only reachable if you already
> Pedro> have the target pushed because you're debugging a threaded core,
> Pedro> and then do "attach"...
> 
> Now that there's a public AIX box I suppose I have no excuse.  I'll give
> it a try and see what happens.  If it fails then I think we'll need some
> explicit field on the target rather than trying to deduce properties of
> the target based on whether it implements some methods.

I'm sure that if something goes wrong with AIX, we can sort out aix-thread.c
out.  There's should really be no need to push the thread_stratum
target early before there's a process.  linux-thread-db.c gets by
without that just fine, so just this.

-- 
Pedro Alves