From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@broadcom.com>
Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hardware watchpoints turned off, inferior not yet started
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 12:32:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <525E8761.8060405@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <525E5EB6.4070305@broadcom.com>
On 10/16/2013 10:39 AM, Andrew Burgess wrote:
> The following seems confusing to me:
>
> $ gdb -q watch.x
> Reading symbols from /some/path/to/watch.x...done.
> (gdb) set can-use-hw-watchpoints 0
> (gdb) watch -l my_var
> Hardware watchpoint 1: -location my_var
> (gdb)
>
> Notice that despite turning hardware watchpoints off
> the watchpoint created is reported to be a hardware
> watchpoint. Once I actually start the inferior the
> watchpoint is downgraded to a software watchpoint,
> but still, this feels like it might cause confusion,
> and is pretty easy to fix.
It seems wrong to me to create it as bp_hardware_watchpoint
in the first place. That's done in watch_command_1, with:
if (accessflag == hw_read)
bp_type = bp_read_watchpoint;
else if (accessflag == hw_access)
bp_type = bp_access_watchpoint;
else
bp_type = bp_hardware_watchpoint;
If "can-use-hw-watchpoints" is off, then I think it'd
be also better to prohibit creating read and access
watchpoints around here.
> @@ -1800,6 +1800,8 @@ update_watchpoint (struct watchpoint *b, int reparse)
> /* Without execution, memory can't change. No use to try and
> set watchpoint locations. The watchpoint will be reset when
> the target gains execution, through breakpoint_re_set. */
> + if (!can_use_hw_watchpoints)
> + b->base.type = bp_watchpoint;
> }
... this change I think makes it so that access/read
watchpoints get converted to software watchpoints, which is wrong.
--
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-16 12:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-16 9:39 Andrew Burgess
2013-10-16 12:32 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2013-10-16 15:43 ` Andrew Burgess
2013-10-16 16:28 ` Pedro Alves
2013-10-18 9:14 ` Andrew Burgess
2013-10-18 14:37 ` Andrew Burgess
2013-10-18 15:33 ` Pedro Alves
2013-10-18 16:26 ` Andrew Burgess
2013-10-18 15:26 ` Pedro Alves
2013-10-18 15:43 ` Andrew Burgess
2013-11-07 12:21 Jose E. Marchesi
2013-11-08 12:03 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=525E8761.8060405@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=aburgess@broadcom.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox