From: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
To: Muhammad Waqas <mwaqas@codesourcery.com>
Cc: <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>, <tromey@redhat.com>,
<ali_anwar@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH with testcase] Bug 11568 - delete thread-specific breakpoint on the thread exit
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 09:21:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51F633E5.7000302@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51F619CE.5040407@codesourcery.com>
On 07/29/2013 03:29 PM, Muhammad Waqas wrote:
> 2013-07-24 Muhammad Waqas<waqas.jamil47@gmail.com>
Wrong e-mail address?
Should mention PR number in ChangeLog.
>
> * breakpoint.c (breakpoint_auto_delete): Remove breakpoint
> Remove thread related breakpoints if threads are exited.
>
"Remove breakpoint" can be removed, IMO.
> cvs diff -up gdb/breakpoint.c
>
>
> Index: gdb/breakpoint.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/breakpoint.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.772
> diff -u -p -r1.772 breakpoint.c
> --- gdb/breakpoint.c 6 Jul 2013 07:14:54 -0000 1.772
> +++ gdb/breakpoint.c 24 Jul 2013 05:18:24 -0000
> @@ -11910,6 +11910,12 @@ breakpoint_auto_delete (bpstat bs)
> {
> if (b->disposition == disp_del_at_next_stop)
> delete_breakpoint (b);
> + else if (b->thread > 0) /* If breakpoint relates to user created
> thread Check if it's not alive then delete it*/
This line is too long, and your mailer wrap the patch.
> + {
> + struct thread_info * tp = find_thread_id (b->thread) ;
> + if (tp != NULL && (tp->state == THREAD_EXITED ||
> !target_thread_alive (tp->ptid)))
Likewise.
> + delete_breakpoint (b);
> + }
> }
> }
>
I am wondering why don't we register to thread_exit observer, and remove
breakpoints when thread exits. arm-linux-nat.c and ppc-linux-nat.c did
something similar to delete thread hw breakpoint. However, I am not
sure it is safe to do so considering async/non-stop mode.
> gdb/testcase/Changlog
>
> 2013-07-29 Muhammad Waqas<mwaqas@codesourcery.com>
>
> * gdb.threads/thread-specific-bp.c: New file
It is copied from Jan's example in bugzilla, better to list his name
here too.
> * gdb.threads/thread-specific-bp.exp: New file.
>
>
> gdb.threads/thread-specific-bp.c
Please include these new added files into the patch. So that reviewers
can apply your patch to get these new files.
We need a copyright header for test files too.
> gdb.threads/thread-specific-bp.exp
>
> #This test verfiy that Breakpoint on a spacific thread is deleted
>
> standard_testfile
> if {[gdb_compile_pthreads \
> "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" \
> "${binfile}" executable {debug} ] != "" } {
> return -1
> }
> clean_restart ${binfile}
>
> if [runto main] then {
> gdb_breakpoint "start"
> gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "start"
> gdb_test_multiple "info threads" "get thread 1 id" {
> -re "(\[0-9\]+)(\[^\n\r\]*Thread\[^\n\r\]*start.*)($gdb_prompt $)" {
> pass "thread created"
> }
> }
> # get the id of thread
> set thre $expect_out(1,string)
> gdb_breakpoint [gdb_get_line_number "line # 13"]
> gdb_breakpoint "main thread $thre"
> gdb_test "info break" ".*breakpoint.*(thread $thre)"
> gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "line # 13"
> gdb_test "info break" ".*breakpoint.*(thread \[^$thre\])*"
> }
>
This test passes even without your patch to breakpoint_auto_delete
above. Please make sure the test fails without your patch, and fails go
away when your patch is applied.
>
> Running target unix
> Running ./gdb.threads/thread-specific-bp.exp ...
> PASS: gdb.threads/thread-specific-bp.exp: successfully compiled posix
> threads test case
> PASS: gdb.threads/thread-specific-bp.exp: continue to breakpoint: start
> PASS: gdb.threads/thread-specific-bp.exp: thread created
> PASS: gdb.threads/thread-specific-bp.exp: info break
^^^^^^^^^^
> PASS: gdb.threads/thread-specific-bp.exp: continue to breakpoint: line # 13
> PASS: gdb.threads/thread-specific-bp.exp: info break
^^^^^^^^^^^
Duplicated test results. Please make them unique. Like,
PASS: gdb.threads/thread-specific-bp.exp: info break 1
...
PASS: gdb.threads/thread-specific-bp.exp: info break 2
--
Yao (é½å°§)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-29 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-29 7:29 Muhammad Waqas
2013-07-29 9:21 ` Yao Qi [this message]
2013-07-29 11:42 ` Muhammad Waqas
2013-07-29 14:18 ` Yao Qi
2013-07-30 10:34 ` Muhammad Waqas
2013-07-31 2:41 ` Yao Qi
2013-08-01 10:51 ` Pedro Alves
2013-08-01 10:59 ` Yao Qi
2013-08-01 11:27 ` Pedro Alves
2013-08-01 12:10 ` Yao Qi
2013-08-01 11:57 ` Pedro Alves
2013-08-01 12:44 ` Muhammad Waqas
2013-08-02 9:45 ` Pedro Alves
2013-08-05 12:01 ` Muhammad Waqas
2013-08-05 13:57 ` Tom Tromey
2013-08-06 6:12 ` Muhammad Waqas
2013-08-22 9:42 ` Muhammad Waqas
2013-08-22 17:14 ` Pedro Alves
2013-08-23 5:31 ` Muhammad Waqas
2013-08-27 11:31 ` Muhammad Waqas
2013-08-27 19:02 ` Pedro Alves
2013-08-27 19:06 ` Pedro Alves
2013-08-28 12:26 ` Muhammad Waqas
2013-08-28 12:26 ` Muhammad Waqas
2013-08-30 16:28 ` Pedro Alves
2013-09-02 4:06 ` Muhammad Waqas
2013-09-02 8:39 ` Pedro Alves
2013-09-02 9:46 ` Muhammad Waqas
2013-09-02 10:24 ` Pedro Alves
2013-09-02 10:32 ` Muhammad Waqas
2013-09-02 10:48 ` Pedro Alves
2013-09-02 16:46 ` Pedro Alves
2013-09-02 16:52 ` [PATCH] PR gdb/11568 - delete thread-specific breakpoints on " Pedro Alves
2013-09-09 16:07 ` Tom Tromey
2013-09-17 19:36 ` Pedro Alves
2013-09-19 14:48 ` [COMMIT PATCH] Fix regressions caused by thread-specific breakpoint deletion. (was: Re: [PATCH] PR gdb/11568 - delete thread-specific breakpoints on thread exit) Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51F633E5.7000302@codesourcery.com \
--to=yao@codesourcery.com \
--cc=ali_anwar@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=mwaqas@codesourcery.com \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox