From: Luis Machado <lgustavo@codesourcery.com>
To: Edjunior Barbosa Machado <emachado@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Ulrich Weigand <Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Enable hw watchpoint with longer ranges using DAWR on Power
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 17:59:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51D31512.7020005@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1372786761-29726-1-git-send-email-emachado@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Hi,
The patch looks sane enough. A few nits.
On 07/02/2013 02:39 PM, Edjunior Barbosa Machado wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The new DAWR interface provided by the next generation of Power processors
> (Power ISA Version 2.07) included in the kernel this year allows gdb to use
> hardware watchpoint with longer ranges (up to 512 bytes wide), which can't cross
> a 512 byte boundary [1]. The patch below enables the usage of this new feature,
> currently exported to the userspace as PPC_DEBUG_FEATURE_DATA_BP_DAWR via struct
> ppc_debug_info [2]. Ok?
>
> Thanks and regards,
> --
> Edjunior
>
> [1] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/215520/
> [2] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/229888/
>
> gdb/ChangeLog
> 2013-07-02 Edjunior Barbosa Machado <emachado@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> * ppc-linux-nat.c (PPC_DEBUG_FEATURE_DATA_BP_DAWR): New define.
> (ppc_linux_region_ok_for_hw_watchpoint): Add checking to use the new
> DAWR interface for longer ranges hardware watchpoint (up to 512 bytes).
>
> ---
> gdb/ppc-linux-nat.c | 19 +++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gdb/ppc-linux-nat.c b/gdb/ppc-linux-nat.c
> index 65d4f4a..dd35624 100644
> --- a/gdb/ppc-linux-nat.c
> +++ b/gdb/ppc-linux-nat.c
> @@ -177,7 +177,11 @@ struct ppc_hw_breakpoint
> (1<<((n)+PPC_BREAKPOINT_CONDITION_BE_SHIFT))
> #endif /* PPC_PTRACE_GETHWDBGINFO */
>
> -
> +/* New feature defined on Linux kernel v3.9: DAWR interface, that enables
> + wider watchpoint (up to 512 bytes). */
"New feature" will get old in the future. I'd just mention the feature
itself without assigning any notion of how recent/old it is.
> +#ifndef PPC_DEBUG_FEATURE_DATA_BP_DAWR
> +#define PPC_DEBUG_FEATURE_DATA_BP_DAWR 0x10
> +#endif /* PPC_DEBUG_FEATURE_DATA_BP_DAWR */
>
Are older kernels/libraries that don't define these constants going to
be used with these POWER processors in the future? If not, maybe they
can be dropped instead of forcing their definitions here.
> /* Similarly for the general-purpose (gp0 -- gp31)
> and floating-point registers (fp0 -- fp31). */
> @@ -1502,6 +1506,7 @@ ppc_linux_region_ok_for_hw_watchpoint (CORE_ADDR addr, int len)
> to determine the hardcoded watchable region for watchpoints. */
> if (have_ptrace_booke_interface ())
> {
> + int region_size;
> /* Embedded DAC-based processors, like the PowerPC 440 have ranged
> watchpoints and can watch any access within an arbitrary memory
> region. This is useful to watch arrays and structs, for instance. It
> @@ -1510,11 +1515,17 @@ ppc_linux_region_ok_for_hw_watchpoint (CORE_ADDR addr, int len)
> && booke_debug_info.features & PPC_DEBUG_FEATURE_DATA_BP_RANGE
> && ppc_linux_get_hwcap () & PPC_FEATURE_BOOKE)
> return 2;
> + /* Check if the processor provides DAWR interface. */
> + if (booke_debug_info.features & PPC_DEBUG_FEATURE_DATA_BP_DAWR)
> + /* DAWR interface allows to watch up to 512 byte wide ranges which
> + can't cross a 512 byte boundary. */
> + region_size = 512;
> + else
> + region_size = booke_debug_info.data_bp_alignment;
> /* Server processors provide one hardware watchpoint and addr+len should
> fall in the watchable region provided by the ptrace interface. */
> - if (booke_debug_info.data_bp_alignment
> - && (addr + len > (addr & ~(booke_debug_info.data_bp_alignment - 1))
> - + booke_debug_info.data_bp_alignment))
> + if (region_size
> + && (addr + len > (addr & ~(region_size - 1)) + region_size))
> return 0;
> }
> /* addr+len must fall in the 8 byte watchable region for DABR-based
>
We should really really get this booke thing sorted out. :-)
Otherwise we will be calling everything "booke" and that may lead to
confusion in the future.
Thanks for the patch.
Luis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-02 17:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-02 17:40 Edjunior Barbosa Machado
2013-07-02 17:59 ` Luis Machado [this message]
2013-07-02 18:04 ` Ulrich Weigand
2013-07-02 20:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-07-02 21:02 ` Edjunior Barbosa Machado
2013-07-16 14:13 ` Edjunior Barbosa Machado
2013-07-22 13:19 ` Ulrich Weigand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51D31512.7020005@codesourcery.com \
--to=lgustavo@codesourcery.com \
--cc=Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com \
--cc=emachado@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox