From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] gdb: clean up x86 cpuid implementations
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:59:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51C1D47F.9080604@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201306191120.52053.vapier@gentoo.org>
On 06/19/2013 04:20 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> technically, i386-cpuid.h was spawned from the gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/i386-
> cpuid.h which itself was spawned from the gcc sources (and both include the
> exception) which is why the header was retained.
> then again, FSF owns both, so if we want to drop that, it shouldn't be an
> issue. doesn't matter to me either way.
I'd rather make the GDB header plain GPLv3+. I find it simpler and least
surprising if the header with the exception is only the verbatim(-ish) gcc
imported header. Later on, if/when we want to move/add code to/from the
GDB-specific header, we won't have to bother with this detail again.
Thanks,
--
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-19 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-06 18:51 [patch/rfc] " Mike Frysinger
2013-05-06 19:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-05-06 20:30 ` Mike Frysinger
2013-05-07 2:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-05-07 4:26 ` Doug Evans
2013-05-07 15:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-05-07 13:29 ` [PATCH v2] " Mike Frysinger
2013-05-07 14:08 ` Pedro Alves
2013-05-07 14:19 ` Pedro Alves
2013-05-07 14:31 ` Mike Frysinger
2013-05-07 14:49 ` Pedro Alves
2013-05-07 15:05 ` Mike Frysinger
2013-05-07 15:21 ` Pedro Alves
2013-05-07 15:11 ` [PATCH v3] " Mike Frysinger
2013-06-17 6:16 ` Mike Frysinger
2013-06-17 17:52 ` Pedro Alves
2013-06-18 17:53 ` Mike Frysinger
2013-06-18 18:32 ` Pedro Alves
2013-06-18 23:37 ` Joel Brobecker
2013-06-19 3:12 ` Mike Frysinger
2013-06-19 12:11 ` Pedro Alves
2013-06-19 15:06 ` Mike Frysinger
2013-06-19 15:16 ` Pedro Alves
2013-06-19 15:50 ` Mike Frysinger
2013-06-19 16:59 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2013-06-19 17:35 ` [PATCH v4] " Mike Frysinger
2013-06-19 17:42 ` Pedro Alves
2013-06-19 22:45 ` Mike Frysinger
2013-06-21 11:42 ` Regression for btrace [Re: [PATCH v4] gdb: clean up x86 cpuid implementations] Jan Kratochvil
2013-06-21 15:36 ` Mike Frysinger
2013-06-21 15:41 ` Pedro Alves
2013-06-21 15:51 ` [commit] " Jan Kratochvil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51C1D47F.9080604@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=vapier@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox