From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Cc: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>,
gdb-patches@sourceware.org, "Metzger,
Markus T" <markus.t.metzger@intel.com>
Subject: Regression for btrace [Re: [PATCH v4] gdb: clean up x86 cpuid implementations]
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:42:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130621111800.GA4552@host2.jankratochvil.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201306191829.07274.vapier@gentoo.org>
On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:29:05 +0200, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 June 2013 13:37:50 Pedro Alves wrote:
> > On 06/19/2013 06:24 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > * common/linux-btrace.c: Include i386-cpuid.h.
> > > (intel_supports_btrace): Delete x86 ifdefs and replace inline asm with
> > > call to i386_cpuid.
> > > (cpu_supports_btrace): Likewise.
[...]
> pushed now
Running gdb/testsuite/gdb.btrace/function_call_history.exp ...
+PASS: gdb.btrace/function_call_history.exp: record btrace
+PASS: gdb.btrace/function_call_history.exp: continue to breakpoint: cont to 43
+PASS: gdb.btrace/function_call_history.exp: set record function-call-history-size 0
+FAIL: gdb.btrace/function_call_history.exp: record function-call-history - with size unlimited
[...]
+FAIL: gdb.btrace/function_call_history.exp: show recursive function call history
My Intel CPU is not btrace-capable but after the patch Intel vendor is no
longer correctly identified.
- "movl %%ebx, %0;"
- "movl %%edx, %1;"
- "movl %%ecx, %2;"
- : "=m" (vendor[0]),
- "=m" (vendor[4]),
- "=m" (vendor[8])
- :
- : "%eax", "%ebx", "%ecx", "%edx");
+ if (!i386_cpuid (0, NULL, &ebx, &ecx, &edx))
+ return 0;
+
+ memcpy (&vendor[0], &ebx, 4);
+ memcpy (&vendor[4], &ecx, 4);
+ memcpy (&vendor[8], &edx, 4);
Here ecx and edx are exchanged by the patch.
OK to check in the fix this way?
Jan
gdb/
2013-06-21 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
* common/linux-btrace.c (cpu_supports_btrace): Remove variable vendor,
replace strcmp with signature_INTEL_ebx, signature_INTEL_ecx and
signature_INTEL_edx comparisons.
diff --git a/gdb/common/linux-btrace.c b/gdb/common/linux-btrace.c
index 0ec13bb..b874c84 100644
--- a/gdb/common/linux-btrace.c
+++ b/gdb/common/linux-btrace.c
@@ -382,17 +382,12 @@ static int
cpu_supports_btrace (void)
{
unsigned int ebx, ecx, edx;
- char vendor[13];
if (!i386_cpuid (0, NULL, &ebx, &ecx, &edx))
return 0;
- memcpy (&vendor[0], &ebx, 4);
- memcpy (&vendor[4], &ecx, 4);
- memcpy (&vendor[8], &edx, 4);
- vendor[12] = '\0';
-
- if (strcmp (vendor, "GenuineIntel") == 0)
+ if (ebx == signature_INTEL_ebx && ecx == signature_INTEL_ecx
+ && edx == signature_INTEL_edx)
return intel_supports_btrace ();
/* Don't know about others. Let's assume they do. */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-21 11:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-06 18:51 [patch/rfc] gdb: clean up x86 cpuid implementations Mike Frysinger
2013-05-06 19:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-05-06 20:30 ` Mike Frysinger
2013-05-07 2:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-05-07 4:26 ` Doug Evans
2013-05-07 15:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-05-07 13:29 ` [PATCH v2] " Mike Frysinger
2013-05-07 14:08 ` Pedro Alves
2013-05-07 14:19 ` Pedro Alves
2013-05-07 14:31 ` Mike Frysinger
2013-05-07 14:49 ` Pedro Alves
2013-05-07 15:05 ` Mike Frysinger
2013-05-07 15:21 ` Pedro Alves
2013-05-07 15:11 ` [PATCH v3] " Mike Frysinger
2013-06-17 6:16 ` Mike Frysinger
2013-06-17 17:52 ` Pedro Alves
2013-06-18 17:53 ` Mike Frysinger
2013-06-18 18:32 ` Pedro Alves
2013-06-18 23:37 ` Joel Brobecker
2013-06-19 3:12 ` Mike Frysinger
2013-06-19 12:11 ` Pedro Alves
2013-06-19 15:06 ` Mike Frysinger
2013-06-19 15:16 ` Pedro Alves
2013-06-19 15:50 ` Mike Frysinger
2013-06-19 16:59 ` Pedro Alves
2013-06-19 17:35 ` [PATCH v4] " Mike Frysinger
2013-06-19 17:42 ` Pedro Alves
2013-06-19 22:45 ` Mike Frysinger
2013-06-21 11:42 ` Jan Kratochvil [this message]
2013-06-21 15:36 ` Regression for btrace [Re: [PATCH v4] gdb: clean up x86 cpuid implementations] Mike Frysinger
2013-06-21 15:41 ` Pedro Alves
2013-06-21 15:51 ` [commit] " Jan Kratochvil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130621111800.GA4552@host2.jankratochvil.net \
--to=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=markus.t.metzger@intel.com \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=vapier@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox