Re: [RFC] PR 15075 dprintf interferes with "next"

[Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>]

On 05/28/2013 08:01 AM, Hui Zhu wrote:
>>> +gdb_test_multiple $test $test {
>>> >>+    -re "interrupt\r\n$gdb_prompt " {
>>> >>+     pass $test
>>> >>+    }
>>> >>+}
>>> >>+
>>> >>+set test "inferior stopped"
>>> >>+gdb_test_multiple "" $test {
>>> >>+    -re "\r\n\\\[.* \[0-9\]+\\\] #1 stopped\\\.\r\n" {
>>> >>+     pass $test
>>> >>+    }
>>> >>+}
>> >
>> >This leaves the prompt in the expect buffer.  I think
>> >this is likely to confuse the following test that runs.
>> >
> After change this part to:
> gdb_test_multiple "" $test {
>      -re "\r\n\\\[.* \[0-9\]+\\\] #1 stopped\\\.\r\n$gdb_prompt" {
> 	pass $test
>      }
> }
> I got:
> Running ../../../src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/dprintf-non-stop.exp ...
> FAIL: gdb.base/dprintf-non-stop.exp: inferior stopped (timeout)
>

because the gdb_prompt has been consumed by the previous matching:

gdb_test_multiple $test $test {
     -re "interrupt\r\n$gdb_prompt " {
                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^
      pass $test
     }
}

> +set test "interrupt"
> +gdb_test_multiple $test $test {
> +    -re "interrupt\r\n$gdb_prompt " {
> +	pass $test
> +    }
> +}
> +
> +set test "inferior stopped"
> +gdb_test_multiple "" $test {
> +    -re "\r\n\\\[.* \[0-9\]+\\\] #1 stopped\\\.\r\n" {
> +	pass $test
> +    }
> +}

I raise a question here that no one asked before, why don't combine 
these two gdb_test_multiple into one? like:

set test "interrupt inferior"
gdb_test_multiple "interrupt" $test {
     -re "interrupt\r\n.*\\\[.* \[0-9\]+\\\] #1 stopped\\\." {
	pass $test
     }
}
-- 
Yao (齐尧)