Re: [RFC, gdbserver] Avoid defining linux_read_offsets when the target does not need it

[Luis Machado <lgustavo@codesourcery.com>]

On 05/15/2013 07:12 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 May 2013 12:26:06 Luis Machado wrote:
>> On 05/15/2013 06:06 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 15 May 2013 07:25:34 Luis Machado wrote:
>>>> uClibc-based targets can load their programs in an offset in memory, and
>>>> this information has historically been communicated to gdbserver via
>>>> ptrace with the following options: PT_TEXT_ADDR, PT_DATA_ADDR and
>>>> PT_TEXT_END_ADDR.
>>>
>>> well, not to be pedantic, but this is for FLAT programs, not uClibc
>>
>> Ok. uClibc has been used here due to its gdbserver-specific #if guard
>> explicitly checking for UCLIBC and mmu-lessness.
>
> because no other C lib supports FLAT currently :)

Ah, that explains it. :-)

>>>> We have a target that uses loadmaps as opposed to the above mechanism.
>>>> It is just another ptrace request, but it doesn't use linux_read_offsets
>>>> at all.
>>>
>>> you mean FDPIC ?  gdb already supports that and uses a different set of
>>> ptrace requests for that.  ideally, gdb nor gdbserver should not be tied
>>> to a specific file format (what format it happened to be compiled for).
>>> instead, gdbserver should support all formats and then gdb detects the
>>> format and changes its requests based on that.
>>
>> Not FDPIC, but DSBT. I agree gdb/gdbserver should be format-agnostic,
>> but it grew like this. Let's not extend the uglyness though.
>
> i thought someone already committed support for DSBT, and i helped merge some
> of the FDPIC differences.  it was for the c6x port iirc.

That is correct, but there are a few differences in the loadmap format 
between targets.  My idea is to clean that up and make it more generic 
without having to use #if blocks inside linux-low.c.

Luis