From: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
To: <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] range stepping: gdb
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 12:35:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5167AFF3.2050508@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51666804.6060903@codesourcery.com>
On 04/11/2013 03:36 PM, Yao Qi wrote:
> It is incorrect to copy address to buffer via phex_nz here and
> somewhere else in remote.c. We should use remote_address_masked first
> to mask the CORE_ADDR and then call hexnumstr to copy address to
> buffer. Here is an updated one.
After a further thought, I decide to withdraw the updated patch 4/7, and
keep using the original V2 patch 4/7. The comments of variable
'remote_address_size' say:
/* This variable sets the number of bits in an address that are to be
sent in a memory ("M" or "m") packet. Normally, after stripping
leading zeros, the entire address would be sent. This variable
restricts the address to REMOTE_ADDRESS_SIZE bits. HISTORY: The
initial implementation of remote.c restricted the address sent in
memory packets to ``host::sizeof long'' bytes - (typically 32
bits). Consequently, for 64 bit targets, the upper 32 bits of an
address was never sent. Since fixing this bug may cause a break in
some remote targets this variable is principly provided to
facilitate backward compatibility. */
static unsigned int remote_address_size;
variable 'remote_address_size' has only effect on memory packet and
breakpoint packet (it is not documented, but actually used). Address in
these packets should be masked by remote_address_masked, and address in
new packets should not be, because the stub supports these new packets
should be able to parse address correctly.
--
Yao (é½å°§)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-12 6:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-11 12:52 [PATCH 0/7] Range stepping Yao Qi
2013-03-11 12:53 ` [PATCH 4/7] range stepping: gdb Yao Qi
2013-05-14 18:31 ` Pedro Alves
2013-05-15 8:07 ` Yao Qi
2013-05-20 17:59 ` Pedro Alves
2013-03-11 12:53 ` [PATCH 5/7] range stepping: New command 'maint set range stepping' Yao Qi
2013-03-11 17:05 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-03-18 3:10 ` Yao Qi
2013-03-18 5:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-05-14 18:31 ` Pedro Alves
2013-03-11 12:53 ` [PATCH 6/7] range stepping: test case Yao Qi
2013-05-14 18:32 ` Pedro Alves
2013-05-15 8:27 ` Yao Qi
2013-05-20 18:29 ` Pedro Alves
2013-05-22 14:01 ` Yao Qi
2013-03-11 12:53 ` [PATCH 1/7] New macro THREAD_WITHIN_SINGLE_STEP_RANGE Yao Qi
2013-05-14 19:24 ` Pedro Alves
2013-03-11 12:53 ` [PATCH 3/7] range stepping: gdbserver on x86/linux Yao Qi
2013-05-14 18:30 ` Pedro Alves
2013-05-15 7:40 ` Yao Qi
2013-05-20 18:00 ` Pedro Alves
2013-05-22 10:06 ` Yao Qi
2013-03-11 12:53 ` [PATCH 2/7] Move rs->support_vCont_t to a separate struct Yao Qi
2013-03-11 12:53 ` [PATCH 7/7] range stepping: doc and NEWS Yao Qi
2013-03-11 13:38 ` Abid, Hafiz
2013-03-11 17:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-05-14 18:32 ` Pedro Alves
2013-03-14 20:12 ` [PATCH 0/7] Range stepping Pedro Alves
2013-03-15 19:54 ` Pedro Alves
2013-03-22 2:25 ` Yao Qi
2013-03-22 20:24 ` Pedro Alves
2013-04-11 6:16 ` [PATCH 0/7 V2] " Yao Qi
2013-04-11 6:17 ` [PATCH 1/7] New macro THREAD_WITHIN_SINGLE_STEP_RANGE Yao Qi
2013-04-11 6:17 ` [PATCH 2/7] Move rs->support_vCont_t to a separate struct Yao Qi
2013-04-11 6:18 ` [PATCH 3/7] range stepping: gdbserver on x86/linux Yao Qi
2013-04-11 6:19 ` [PATCH 5/7] range stepping: New command 'maint set range stepping' Yao Qi
2013-04-11 23:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-04-11 6:19 ` [PATCH 4/7] range stepping: gdb Yao Qi
2013-04-11 13:22 ` Yao Qi
2013-04-12 12:35 ` Yao Qi [this message]
2013-04-11 6:38 ` [PATCH 6/7] range stepping: test case Yao Qi
2013-04-11 7:30 ` [PATCH 7/7] range stepping: doc and NEWS Yao Qi
2013-04-11 23:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-04-12 20:48 ` [PATCH 0/7 V2] Range stepping Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5167AFF3.2050508@codesourcery.com \
--to=yao@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox