From: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
To: <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/7] Range stepping
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 12:52:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1363006291-13334-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> (raw)
Hi,
When user types "next" command on the following line of source,
a = b + c + d * e - a;
GDB will single step every instruction belongs to this source line
and stop when program goes to the next line, the following is the
assembly of this source line
0x08048434 <+65>: mov 0x1c(%esp),%eax
0x08048438 <+69>: mov 0x30(%esp),%edx
0x0804843c <+73>: add %eax,%edx
0x0804843e <+75>: mov 0x18(%esp),%eax
0x08048442 <+79>: imul 0x2c(%esp),%eax
0x08048447 <+84>: add %edx,%eax
0x08048449 <+86>: sub 0x34(%esp),%eax
0x0804844d <+90>: mov %eax,0x34(%esp)
0x08048451 <+94>: mov 0x1c(%esp),%eax
the following will happen between GDB and GDBserver in remote
debugging,
--> vCont;s:p2e13.2e13;c
<-- T0505:68efffbf;04:30efffbf;08:3c840408;thread:p2e13.2e13;core:1;
--> vCont;s:p2e13.2e13;c
<-- T0505:68efffbf;04:30efffbf;08:3e840408;thread:p2e13.2e13;core:2;
--> vCont;s:p2e13.2e13;c
<-- T0505:68efffbf;04:30efffbf;08:42840408;thread:p2e13.2e13;core:2;
--> vCont;s:p2e13.2e13;c
<-- T0505:68efffbf;04:30efffbf;08:47840408;thread:p2e13.2e13;core:0;
--> vCont;s:p2e13.2e13;c
<-- T0505:68efffbf;04:30efffbf;08:49840408;thread:p2e13.2e13;core:0;
--> vCont;s:p2e13.2e13;c
<-- T0505:68efffbf;04:30efffbf;08:4d840408;thread:p2e13.2e13;core:0;
--> vCont;s:p2e13.2e13;c
<-- T0505:68efffbf;04:30efffbf;08:51840408;thread:p2e13.2e13;core:0;
There are some round-trip between GDB and GDBserver. Isn't it boring
and inefficient? so GDB has to say something
different to GDBserver, that is, "keep stepping and report a stop
to me until program goes out of the range of [0x08048434, 0x08048451)"
then, the RSP traffic looks like this,
--> vCont;r8048434,8048451:p2db0.2db0;c
<-- T0505:68efffbf;04:30efffbf;08:51840408;thread:p2db0.2db0;core:1;
As we can see, GDB tells GDBserver a range of stepping, and GDBserver
only sends stop reply back when programs goes out of the range.
The number of packets is reduced dramatically, and as a result,
the performance of stepping a source line is improved. We call it
"range stepping".
In this patch series, we add range stepping support in GDBserver on
x86/linux and in GDB. GDB is able to send "vCont;r" packet for other
remote stubs if "vCont;r" is supported. We tested GDB with GDBserver
on x86_64-linux, and also test mips-sde-elf GDB with a stub understands
range stepping. No regressions.
Is it OK after the release branch is created?
--
1.7.7.6
next reply other threads:[~2013-03-11 12:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-11 12:52 Yao Qi [this message]
2013-03-11 12:53 ` [PATCH 4/7] range stepping: gdb Yao Qi
2013-05-14 18:31 ` Pedro Alves
2013-05-15 8:07 ` Yao Qi
2013-05-20 17:59 ` Pedro Alves
2013-03-11 12:53 ` [PATCH 6/7] range stepping: test case Yao Qi
2013-05-14 18:32 ` Pedro Alves
2013-05-15 8:27 ` Yao Qi
2013-05-20 18:29 ` Pedro Alves
2013-05-22 14:01 ` Yao Qi
2013-03-11 12:53 ` [PATCH 5/7] range stepping: New command 'maint set range stepping' Yao Qi
2013-03-11 17:05 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-03-18 3:10 ` Yao Qi
2013-03-18 5:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-05-14 18:31 ` Pedro Alves
2013-03-11 12:53 ` [PATCH 1/7] New macro THREAD_WITHIN_SINGLE_STEP_RANGE Yao Qi
2013-05-14 19:24 ` Pedro Alves
2013-03-11 12:53 ` [PATCH 2/7] Move rs->support_vCont_t to a separate struct Yao Qi
2013-03-11 12:53 ` [PATCH 7/7] range stepping: doc and NEWS Yao Qi
2013-03-11 13:38 ` Abid, Hafiz
2013-03-11 17:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-05-14 18:32 ` Pedro Alves
2013-03-11 12:53 ` [PATCH 3/7] range stepping: gdbserver on x86/linux Yao Qi
2013-05-14 18:30 ` Pedro Alves
2013-05-15 7:40 ` Yao Qi
2013-05-20 18:00 ` Pedro Alves
2013-05-22 10:06 ` Yao Qi
2013-03-14 20:12 ` [PATCH 0/7] Range stepping Pedro Alves
2013-03-15 19:54 ` Pedro Alves
2013-03-22 2:25 ` Yao Qi
2013-03-22 20:24 ` Pedro Alves
2013-04-11 6:16 ` [PATCH 0/7 V2] " Yao Qi
2013-04-11 6:17 ` [PATCH 2/7] Move rs->support_vCont_t to a separate struct Yao Qi
2013-04-11 6:17 ` [PATCH 1/7] New macro THREAD_WITHIN_SINGLE_STEP_RANGE Yao Qi
2013-04-11 6:18 ` [PATCH 3/7] range stepping: gdbserver on x86/linux Yao Qi
2013-04-11 6:19 ` [PATCH 4/7] range stepping: gdb Yao Qi
2013-04-11 13:22 ` Yao Qi
2013-04-12 12:35 ` Yao Qi
2013-04-11 6:19 ` [PATCH 5/7] range stepping: New command 'maint set range stepping' Yao Qi
2013-04-11 23:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-04-11 6:38 ` [PATCH 6/7] range stepping: test case Yao Qi
2013-04-11 7:30 ` [PATCH 7/7] range stepping: doc and NEWS Yao Qi
2013-04-11 23:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-04-12 20:48 ` [PATCH 0/7 V2] Range stepping Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1363006291-13334-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com \
--to=yao@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox