Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiong Wang <jiwang@tilera.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>, Walter Lee <walt@tilera.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/TileGX 2/6] simplify the handling of skip prologue for plt stub
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 15:12:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50F9664D.2090008@tilera.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130118131511.GF3564@adacore.com>


>> for tilegx,  when skip prologue, if the start_pc is a plt stub address, then
>> stop to go further, just return the start_pc.
>>
>> gdb/ChangeLog:
>>
>>         * tilegx-tdep.c (tilegx_skip_prologue): simplify the handling for
>>         plt stub.
> Can you provide an example where this becomes necessary? I don't
> see a problem with the patch per se, but I don't remember seeing
> other ports doing this...
>
yes, there are some tricky thing.

   for the simple hello.c

#include <stdio.h>
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
printf("hello, %d\n", argc);
return 0
}

without this patch
===
-bash-4.1$ gcc -o hello.tile hello.c
-bash-4.1$ ./gdb hello.tile
(gdb) b printf
Error accessing memory address 0x10a40: Success.

after this patch
===
(gdb) b printf
Breakpoint 1 at 0x10a40


this is because tilegx skip_prologue will invoke 
tilegx_analyze_prologue, which
will prefetch 32*8 bytes.

while for when the address is in plt stub,  you can see it near the 
eh_frame_hdr section

   [14] .plt                         0000000000010a00 000a00 0000a0 28  
AX  0   0 64
   ...
   [16] .eh_frame_hdr     0000000000010ac0 000ac0 000024 00   A  0 0  4
   [17] .eh_frame             0000000000010ae8 000ae8 0000b4 00   A 0   0  8

the .eh_frame_hdr aligns to 4, there is a hole between .eh_frame_hdr and 
.eh_frame, and this
will cause trouble for section_table_xfer_memory_partial.

after fetch memory starting from 0x10ac0 to 0x10ae4, then the memaddr 
will be 0x10ae4 in section_table_xfer_memory_partial,
while this function did not consider this hole situation, so goes to 
line 666, error occured.

for other targets, like x86, I have done a brief exploration,  seems 
they do not have large prefetch window




  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-18 15:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-18  9:25 Jiong Wang
2013-01-18 13:15 ` Joel Brobecker
2013-01-18 15:12   ` Jiong Wang [this message]
2013-01-18 17:30     ` Pedro Alves
2013-02-15  3:22       ` Jiong Wang
2013-02-16  4:50     ` Yao Qi
2013-02-20  2:49       ` Jiong Wang
2013-02-20  4:11         ` Yao Qi
2013-02-21 13:40           ` Jiong Wang
2013-03-01 10:35             ` Jiong Wang
2013-03-01 11:31             ` Pedro Alves
2013-03-01 14:08               ` Jiong Wang
2013-03-01 15:59                 ` Pedro Alves
2013-03-02  1:40                   ` [COMMITTED][RFC/TileGX " Jiong Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50F9664D.2090008@tilera.com \
    --to=jiwang@tilera.com \
    --cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=walt@tilera.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox