Re: [RFA] Fix an error in value_change_enclosing_type

[Pierre Muller <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>]

A 22:39 22/10/2002, Elena Zannoni a écrit :
>muller@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr writes:
> > At 17:05 18/10/2002 -0400, Elena Zannoni wrote:
> > >Pierre Muller writes:
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > the function value_change_enclosing_type
> > > > does not set the enlclosing_type field correctly if
> > > > the new_encl_type has a bigger length that the value type.
> > > > 
> > > > Its seems quite astonishing that this has not been noticed before, 
> > > > but I discovered it when trying to get 
> > > > the fpc-abi.c code to work correctly.
> > > > 
> > >
> > >The fix seems OK. However, do you have a small testcase? It would be
> > >good to add it to the testsuite.
> > Sorry, but I don't have any, because I really don't even know
> > if this code is ever executed for C code. It is for
> > Free Pascal generated code, that is how I discovered that bug.
> > But I can't add tests with Free Pascal anyhow.
> > 
>
>Oh, ok.
>
> > >Does this fix changes the results for the already existing tests?
> > 
> > Sorry, but I never worked with the testsuite,
> > so I can't answer this question.
> > 
>
>Could you run make check in your gdb/testsuite directory in the build
>tree?  All I meant is, whether or not the test results are different
>before and after your change.
>
>thanks
>Elena


I tried to create a test program
using C++ code, but it does never seem to
use the code that I modified...

Thus, as I expected, the testsuite is unchanged:

Tested on a i386 linux  box:
(note that pthreads libs is not installed on that machine,
which creates several failures)
cvs tree from 29/10/2002:

                === gdb Summary ===

# of expected passes            8235
# of unexpected failures        52
# of unexpected successes       10
# of expected failures          168
# of unresolved testcases       3
# of untested testcases         9
# of unsupported tests          4
/home/pierre/gdb/build/origdb/testsuite/../../gdb/gdb version  2002-10-29-cvs -nx

same cvs tree + my patch :


                === gdb Summary ===

# of expected passes            8236
# of unexpected failures        51
# of unexpected successes       10
# of expected failures          168
# of unresolved testcases       3
# of untested testcases         9
# of unsupported tests          4
/home/pierre/gdb/build/origdb/testsuite/../../gdb/gdb version  2002-10-29-cvs -nx


But  the only difference is between gdbcvs.sum and modgdb.sum
is 
5166c5166
< FAIL: gdb.c++/annota2.exp: annotate-quit
---
> PASS: gdb.c++/annota2.exp: annotate-quit

which, when you look into gdb.c++/annota2.exp 
is said to be a tests that fails sometimes, but unreproducably.

So I think that we can consider that the 
testsuite result is unchanged.

Can I commit the patch?