Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Muhammad Kamran <muhammad.kamran@arm.com>
To: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
	Wilco Dijkstra <Wilco.Dijkstra@arm.com>,
	Yury Khrustalev <Yury.Khrustalev@arm.com>,
	Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@linaro.org>,
	Adhemerval Zanella Netto <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>,
	Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>,
	Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>,
	Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] gdb: Fix internal inferior calls through GNU IFUNCs
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2026 10:19:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ceccaac-8d04-4c13-8d73-2cd5c5643980@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260816002317.2a44f116@f44-mesa-1>



On 16/08/2026 08:24, Kevin Buettner wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Aug 2026 13:12:17 +0000
> Muhammad Kamran <muhammad.kamran@arm.com> wrote:
> 
>> This series fixes a GDB inferior-call issue exposed by malloc being a GNU
>> IFUNC in glibc on AArch64.  The underlying problem is not AArch64-specific:
>> it can affect any inferior helper found through find_function_in_inferior's
>> minimal-symbol fallback when that helper is a GNU IFUNC.
>>
>> GDB calls find_function_in_inferior ("malloc") when expression evaluation
>> needs to allocate memory in the inferior, for example for string literal
>> arguments.  In the minimal-symbol fallback, GDB created a synthetic ordinary
>> function pointer from the minimal symbol address.  If the symbol was a GNU
>> IFUNC, this lost the IFUNC marker, so call_function_by_hand did not resolve
>> the symbol before calling it.
>>
>> Patch 1 checks the minimal symbol kind directly and propagates the GNU IFUNC
>> marker to the synthetic function type for mst_text_gnu_ifunc and
>> mst_data_gnu_ifunc symbols.  The existing fallback address and return type
>> are unchanged.
>>
>> Patch 2 fixes the follow-on return-type issue after IFUNC resolution.  When
>> the resolved target type, or the type inferred from the resolver return type,
>> does not provide a usable return type, find_function_addr now keeps the
>> original function type's return type.  This preserves the synthetic fallback
>> return type used by find_function_in_inferior ("malloc").
>>
>> The tests add an internal inferior-call case using an IFUNC malloc and run it
>> through the existing gdb.base/gnu-ifunc.exp matrix for resolver attr,
>> resolver debug info, and resolved-target debug info.
>>
>> Changes since v4:
>> 	* Address feedback from Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>.
>>
>> Changes since v3:
>> 	* Move the ifunc resolver into a shared library.
>>
>> Changes since v2:
>> 	* Rework the minimal-symbol fallback to check the minimal symbol kind
>> 	  directly as suggested by Simon.
>> 	* Add coverage for both debug and no-debug IFUNC malloc variants by
>> 	  using the existing framework.
>> 	* Preserve the original IFUNC return type when the resolved target type
>> 	  is unknown.
> 
> Andrew gave conditional approval for both parts in his v4 replies.
> I've looked over this v5 series; IMO, you've completely addressed his
> concerns.  Therefore, I think you can consider this version approved;
> but do add Andrew's Approved-By tag.  If you need a maintainer to push
> it for you, I'll be happy to do that.

Hi Kevin,

Thanks for reviewing.

I don't have write access, so I'd appreciate it if you could please push
the series for me.

Andrew gave his Approved-By on both patches, so please feel free to add:

Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>

Thanks,
Kamran

> 
> Reviewed-By: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-17  9:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-11 13:12 Muhammad Kamran
2026-08-11 13:12 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] gdb: Preserve IFUNC marker when finding inferior functions Muhammad Kamran
2026-08-11 13:12 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] gdb: Keep original IFUNC return type when target type is unknown Muhammad Kamran
2026-08-16  7:24 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] gdb: Fix internal inferior calls through GNU IFUNCs Kevin Buettner
2026-08-17  9:19   ` Muhammad Kamran [this message]
2026-08-20  9:02     ` Yury Khrustalev
2026-08-20 11:55       ` Andrew Burgess

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4ceccaac-8d04-4c13-8d73-2cd5c5643980@arm.com \
    --to=muhammad.kamran@arm.com \
    --cc=Wilco.Dijkstra@arm.com \
    --cc=Yury.Khrustalev@arm.com \
    --cc=aburgess@redhat.com \
    --cc=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
    --cc=carlos@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
    --cc=simark@simark.ca \
    --cc=thiago.bauermann@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox