Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Edjunior Barbosa Machado <emachado@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] disable ptrace BookE interface for PowerPC server processors
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 04:17:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FC59F24.1060907@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201205291854.q4TIsH0i008399@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl>

On 05/29/2012 03:54 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote:

>> Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 00:49:39 -0300
>> From: Edjunior Barbosa Machado <emachado@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>
>> On 05/22/2012 02:34 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>>
>>> But how are you going to handle this when that functionality does
>>> become available?  
>>
>>
>> Thanks for the feedback and sorry for the late reply. I was discussing
>> with the kernel developer responsible for the next version of the ptrace
>> booke interface and he proposed that the 'features' field from the
>> struct ppc_debug_info returned by ptrace PPC_PTRACE_GETHWDBGINFO call
>> could be used to check if its availability. According to him, this field
>> is currently 0 for servers, but once the new ptrace interface becomes
>> functional, it will return the flag PPC_DEBUG_FEATURE_DATA_BP_RANGE
>> enabled. Moreover, this change will not affect the behavior on embedded
>> processors (which already has PPC_DEBUG_FEATURE_DATA_BP_RANGE and
>> PPC_DEBUG_FEATURE_DATA_BP_MASK enabled).
>>
>> Please consider the new version of the patch below.
> 
> Certainly makes more sense to me ;)


which means this is ok to apply? :)

Thanks for the review once again, Mark.

-- 
Edjunior


  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-30  4:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-22 15:24 Edjunior Barbosa Machado
2012-05-22 17:34 ` Mark Kettenis
2012-05-25  3:50   ` Edjunior Barbosa Machado
2012-05-29 18:54     ` Mark Kettenis
2012-05-30  4:17       ` Edjunior Barbosa Machado [this message]
2012-05-30 15:31         ` Mark Kettenis
2012-05-31 20:56     ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-05-31 22:09       ` Edjunior Barbosa Machado

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FC59F24.1060907@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=emachado@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox