From: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 7/8] Agent capability for static tracepoint
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:29:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F3529C3.8030806@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F3428D4.5060202@redhat.com>
On 02/10/2012 04:13 AM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 01/23/2012 02:07 PM, Yao Qi wrote:
>> > Current libinproctrace.so agent is able to do operations on static
>> > tracepoint, which can be treated as one capability. This patch is to
>> > teach gdbserver to check agent's capability when performing operations
>> > related to static tracepoint.
>> >
> Hmm, not sure. Why aren't these being hooked at the same places
> where we already check/call maybe_write_ipa_ust_not_loaded and
> in_process_agent_loaded_ust?
>
maybe_write_ipa_ust_not_loaded and in_process_agent_loaded_ust returns
agent is loaded or not. Considering GDB may/will support multiple
different agents, which have different capability, so "agent is loaded"
doesn't mean "agent has a certain capability". Is it reasonable?
I'd like replace global variable `ust_loaded' with capability mechanism
in agent.
--
Yao (é½å°§)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-10 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-23 13:37 [patch 0/8] GDB/GDBserver talks with agents Yao Qi
2012-01-23 13:48 ` [patch 1/8] Generalize interaction with agent in gdb/gdbserver Yao Qi
2012-01-30 11:25 ` Yao Qi
2012-02-09 19:21 ` Pedro Alves
2012-02-14 2:41 ` Yao Qi
2012-02-14 10:16 ` Pedro Alves
2012-01-23 13:50 ` [patch 2/8] Add to_use_agent in target_ops Yao Qi
2012-02-09 19:36 ` Pedro Alves
2012-01-23 13:54 ` [patch 3/8] Command `set agent on|off' Yao Qi
2012-01-23 17:14 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-01-24 0:28 ` Yao Qi
2012-01-24 5:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-01-26 1:32 ` Yao Qi
2012-02-09 20:19 ` Pedro Alves
2012-01-23 13:58 ` [patch 4/8] `use_agent' for remote and QAgent Yao Qi
2012-01-23 17:17 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-01-26 2:17 ` Yao Qi
2012-01-26 17:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-02-09 19:55 ` Pedro Alves
2012-01-23 14:03 ` [patch 5/8] Doc for agent Yao Qi
2012-01-23 18:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-01-24 0:51 ` Yao Qi
2012-01-24 8:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-01-26 1:53 ` Yao Qi
2012-01-26 17:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-02-09 19:55 ` Pedro Alves
2012-02-10 13:30 ` Yao Qi
2012-02-10 15:01 ` Pedro Alves
2012-02-10 16:18 ` Yao Qi
2012-02-10 16:28 ` Pedro Alves
2012-02-23 7:51 ` Yao Qi
2012-02-23 19:50 ` Pedro Alves
2012-01-23 14:07 ` [patch 6/8] Agent's capability Yao Qi
2012-01-24 3:49 ` Yao Qi
2012-02-09 20:09 ` Pedro Alves
2012-02-10 12:25 ` Yao Qi
2012-02-10 12:37 ` Pedro Alves
2012-02-10 13:07 ` Yao Qi
2012-01-23 14:29 ` [patch 7/8] Agent capability for static tracepoint Yao Qi
2012-02-09 20:13 ` Pedro Alves
2012-02-10 14:29 ` Yao Qi [this message]
2012-02-10 14:56 ` Pedro Alves
2012-01-23 16:03 ` [patch 8/8] Control agent in testsuite Yao Qi
2012-02-09 20:16 ` Pedro Alves
2012-02-05 4:32 ` [ping] [patch 0/8] GDB/GDBserver talks with agents Yao Qi
2012-02-09 19:02 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F3529C3.8030806@codesourcery.com \
--to=yao@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox