Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Cc: bug-readline@gnu.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
	       Sterling Augustine <saugustine@google.com>
Subject: Re: [Bug-readline] [readline patch, gdb-7.3?] Avoid free from a signal handler [Re: [PATCH] Make interrupting tab-completion safe.]
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:54:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E0B2E83.9030202@case.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110626222146.GA4410@host1.jankratochvil.net>

On 6/26/11 6:21 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> GDB reproducer for the readline bug:
> ------------------------------------
> 
> On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:44:57 +0200, Sterling Augustine wrote:
>> gdb itself isn't big enough to make it easy to reproduce (~24k
>> symbols).
> 
> The goal is to do very many memory allocation functions in GDB, no matter
> which ones.  I found for example libwebkitgtk.so.debug as good sample data,
> optionally added .gdb_index is OK for faster startup, it should contain C++
> functions for more memory operations (therefore GDB itself is not usable as
> the sample data).  Used this GDB .exp file, reproducible in several seconds:
> 
> set binfile "/home/jkratoch/t/rh575292-gdbindex.debug"
> gdb_exit
> gdb_start
> gdb_load ${binfile}
> while 1 {
>     send_gdb "b \t\t"
>     sleep 0.1
>     send_gdb "\003"
>     gdb_test "" "^b \\^CQuit" "Quit seen"
> }
> 
> b ^CQuit
> (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/quit.exp: Quit seen
> b *** glibc detected *** /home/jkratoch/redhat/gdb-clean/gdb/testsuite/../../gdb/gdb: munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer: 0x0000000005b950b0 ***
> 
> One can also add stub expensive mallinfo calls into GDB xmalloc/xfree/etc. for
> better reproducibility.
> 
> 
> The readline bug:
> -----------------
> 
> readline now calls memory allocation/free functions from the readline signal
> handler.  This is not permitted by POSIX and it does corrupt memory such as
> during SiGINT:
> 
> #0  __lll_lock_wait_private () at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/lowlevellock.S:100
> #1  in _L_lock_10461 () from /lib64/libc.so.6
> #2  in __libc_malloc (bytes=139919578014176) at malloc.c:3657
> #3  in __libc_message (do_abort=2, fmt=0x7f41909aebe8 "*** glibc detected *** %s: %s: 0x%s ***\n") at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/libc_fatal.c:137
> #4  in malloc_printerr (action=3, str=0x7f41909aec18 "munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer", ptr=<optimized out>) at malloc.c:6283
> #5  in xfree (ptr=0x5b950b0) at utils.c:1303
> #6  in rl_free_undo_list () at undo.c:119
> #7  in rl_free_line_state () at signals.c:503
> #8  in _rl_handle_signal (sig=2) at signals.c:188
> #9  in rl_signal_handler (sig=2) at signals.c:149
> #10 <signal handler called>
> #11 _int_malloc (av=0x7f4190bea1e0, bytes=177) at malloc.c:4727
> #12 in __libc_malloc (bytes=177) at malloc.c:3660
> #13 in reallochook (ptr=<optimized out>, size=128, caller=0xd6f531) at mcheck.c:335
> #14 in d_growable_string_resize (dgs=0x7fff34b0d150, need=122) at ./cp-demangle.c:3247
> #15 in d_growable_string_init (dgs=0x7fff34b0d150, estimate=122) at ./cp-demangle.c:3226
> #16 in cplus_demangle_print (options=3, dc=0x4114fe8, estimate=122, palc=0x7fff34b0d198) at ./cp-demangle.c:3416
> #17 in cp_comp_to_string (result=0x4114fe8, estimated_len=122) at cp-name-parser.y:1965
> #18 in cp_canonicalize_string (string=0x93f4e20 "WebCore::FrameLoader::loadProvisionalItemFromCachedPage(void)") at cp-support.c:139
> [...]
> 
> Unfortunately it leaks a bit now and also for example during SIGWINCH readline
> calls xmalloc which cannot be ignored/delayed so easily as xfree.
> 
> Please postpone any memory management function only after the signal handler.

If you feel that you need to make this change for the current version of
gdb, go ahead.  I will keep going in the direction readline-6.2 began:
using the RL_CHECK_SIGNALS macro to run signal handling code outside the
signal handler and minimizing the use of _rl_interrupt_immediately without
destroying performance.

The big problem is to allow operations that read through the file system
(like completion) to be interrupted without running unsafe functions from
a signal handler.  Wrapping completion functions is the current remaining
use of _rl_interrupt_immediately.  It does the user no good to keep
setting the "I got SIGINT" flag if he's trying to complete files on a dead
or otherwise unreachable file server.

Chet
-- 
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
		 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU    chet@case.edu    http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-06-29 13:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-11  0:19 [PATCH] Make interrupting tab-completion safe Sterling Augustine
2011-06-12 12:12 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-06-13 17:45   ` Sterling Augustine
2011-06-26 22:22     ` [readline patch, gdb-7.3?] Avoid free from a signal handler [Re: [PATCH] Make interrupting tab-completion safe.] Jan Kratochvil
2011-06-27 16:03       ` Joel Brobecker
2011-06-29 21:49         ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-06-29 13:54       ` Chet Ramey [this message]
2011-06-29 20:35         ` [Bug-readline] " Jan Kratochvil
2011-06-30 14:38           ` Chet Ramey
2011-07-06 16:03             ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-07-06 16:07               ` Chet Ramey
2011-07-06 17:42                 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-07-07 13:40                   ` Chet Ramey
2011-07-08 16:03                     ` Chet Ramey
2011-10-19 20:30                       ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-10-19 17:02                     ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-10-19 17:51                       ` Pedro Alves
2011-10-19 18:50                       ` Chet Ramey
2011-07-11 18:53     ` [PATCH] Make interrupting tab-completion safe Sterling Augustine
2011-07-11 18:54       ` Jan Kratochvil
     [not found]         ` <CAEG7qUxFvEoJ-E2YsoFPL-tKoK4kD3-pKn-h31uUeXQoDD2Gaw@mail.gmail.com>
2011-07-12 15:59           ` [dwarf2_mark_helper patch] " Jan Kratochvil
2011-07-12 17:48             ` Sterling Augustine
2011-07-12 18:56             ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-07-12 21:18             ` [commit] " Jan Kratochvil
2011-07-12 21:42               ` Tom Tromey
2011-07-12 22:51                 ` Jan Kratochvil

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E0B2E83.9030202@case.edu \
    --to=chet.ramey@case.edu \
    --cc=bug-readline@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
    --cc=saugustine@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox