From: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
To: Terry Guo <terry.guo@arm.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, pedro@codesourcery.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix that different function breakpoints are set at same pc address (PR gdb/12703)
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 08:00:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E0ADB87.20807@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000501cc362a$2e7f9020$8b7eb060$@guo@arm.com>
On 06/29/2011 03:00 PM, Terry Guo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is my case. As for stack backtrace, I wonder whether it works for the function that only contains one single instruction and function that doesn't even has a valid prologue. I also saw that current prologue analyzer cannot handle all cases, so I try to avoid this in a more general way.
>
> register unsigned long guard asm("r5");
>
> void bar (void);
> void test (void) __attribute__((naked));
attribute naked on the ARM, AVR, MCORE, RX and SPU ports indicates that
the specified function does not need prologue/epilogue sequences
generated by the compiler, so there is no prologue in function test. Of
course, prologue analyzer can't help here.
However, this test case is not a correct program, because code after
"test" is unknown. If you put correct epilogue in "test" to make it
either return to main, or jump to bar, prologue analyzer can handle it
correctly.
Looks this test case is invalid. We have to find a valid/correct case
to show gdb's bug on setting breakpoint, and your patch could fix this bug.
--
Yao (é½å°§)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-29 8:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-27 11:26 Terry Guo
2011-06-29 1:26 ` Terry Guo
2011-06-29 5:36 ` Yao Qi
2011-06-29 7:00 ` Terry Guo
2011-06-29 8:00 ` Yao Qi [this message]
2011-06-29 8:49 ` Terry Guo
[not found] ` <45520D6299C11E4588128526465332BB0D0C8B1246@SAROVARA.Asiapac.Arm.com>
2011-06-29 10:00 ` Yao Qi
2011-06-29 10:17 ` Terry Guo
2011-07-01 8:59 ` Richard Earnshaw
2011-07-01 9:47 ` Pedro Alves
2011-07-13 13:21 ` Terry Guo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-06-24 2:31 Terry Guo
2011-06-24 3:55 ` Yao Qi
2011-06-24 8:59 ` Pedro Alves
2011-06-24 10:39 ` Yao Qi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E0ADB87.20807@codesourcery.com \
--to=yao@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
--cc=terry.guo@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox