From: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] Fixes to gdb.base/dump.exp: get value from address instead of name
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:28:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E031526.6040309@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m339j1kh00.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 800 bytes --]
On 06/22/2011 11:44 PM, Tom Tromey wrote:
>>>>>> "Yao" == Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com> writes:
>
> Yao> +proc capture_value_with_type { expression } {
>
> I don't fully understand this proc. Some comments would help.
>
Sorry about that. Some comments are added in new patch.
> Yao> + if [regexp { \(.*\).*[0-9]+} $expect_out(0,string) output_string] {
>
> Is [0-9]+ really correct?
> I would have thought the results would be in hex.
Oh, you are right. Fixed.
> This would be a good spot for a comment describing the expected output.
>
Comment is added.
> Yao> + pass "$test $output_string"
> Yao> + } else {
> Yao> + fail "$test unable to match regexp"
> Yao> + }
>
> Passes and fails should use the same text.
Fixed.
patch 2/2 is unchanged.
--
Yao (é½å°§)
[-- Attachment #2: 0017-fix-for-test_reload_saved_value.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 4109 bytes --]
gdb/testsuite/
* gdb.base/dump.exp (capture_pointer_with_type): New.
Get value from address instead of name.
---
gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/dump.exp | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/dump.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/dump.exp
index 1f307f4..15bb249 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/dump.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/dump.exp
@@ -152,6 +152,34 @@ proc capture_value { expression args } {
return $output_string
}
+# POINTER is a pointer and this proc captures the value of POINTER along
+# with POINTER's type. For example, POINTER is "&intarray", this proc will
+# call "p &intarray", capture "(int (*)[32]) 0x804a0e0", and return this
+# string.
+
+proc capture_pointer_with_type { pointer } {
+ global gdb_prompt
+ global expect_out
+
+ set test "capture type of pointer $pointer"
+ set output_string ""
+ gdb_test_multiple "p ${pointer}" $test {
+ -re "\\$\[0-9\]+ = .*$gdb_prompt $" {
+ # Expected output of "p ${pointer}" is like "$7 = (int (*)[32]) 0x804a0e0",
+ # and we want to extract "(int (*)[32]) 0x804a0e0" from it via
+ # following regexp.
+ if [regexp { \(.*\).*[a-fA-F0-9]+} $expect_out(0,string) output_string] {
+ # OUTPUT_STRING is expected to be like "(int (*)[32]) 0x804a0e0".
+ pass "$test"
+ } else {
+ fail "$test"
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ return $output_string
+}
+
set array_start [capture_value "/x &intarray\[0\]"]
set array_end [capture_value "/x &intarray\[32\]"]
set struct_start [capture_value "/x &intstruct"]
@@ -160,6 +188,9 @@ set struct_end [capture_value "/x &intstruct + 1"]
set array_val [capture_value "intarray"]
set struct_val [capture_value "intstruct"]
+set array_ptr_type [capture_pointer_with_type "&intarray"]
+set struct_ptr_type [capture_pointer_with_type "&intstruct"]
+
make_dump_file "dump mem intarr2.bin $array_start $array_end" \
"dump array as memory, default"
@@ -255,38 +286,38 @@ proc test_restore_saved_value { restore_args msg oldval newval } {
# srec format can not be loaded for 64-bit-only platforms
if ![string compare $is64bitonly "no"] then {
test_reload_saved_value "intarr1.srec" "reload array as value, srec" \
- $array_val "intarray"
+ $array_val "\*$array_ptr_type"
test_reload_saved_value "intstr1.srec" "reload struct as value, srec" \
- $struct_val "intstruct"
+ $struct_val "\*$struct_ptr_type"
test_reload_saved_value "intarr2.srec" "reload array as memory, srec" \
- $array_val "intarray"
+ $array_val "\*$array_ptr_type"
test_reload_saved_value "intstr2.srec" "reload struct as memory, srec" \
- $struct_val "intstruct"
+ $struct_val "\*$struct_ptr_type"
}
# ihex format can not be loaded for 64-bit-only platforms
if ![string compare $is64bitonly "no"] then {
test_reload_saved_value "intarr1.ihex" "reload array as value, intel hex" \
- $array_val "intarray"
+ $array_val "\*$array_ptr_type"
test_reload_saved_value "intstr1.ihex" "reload struct as value, intel hex" \
- $struct_val "intstruct"
+ $struct_val "\*$struct_ptr_type"
test_reload_saved_value "intarr2.ihex" "reload array as memory, intel hex" \
- $array_val "intarray"
+ $array_val "\*$array_ptr_type"
test_reload_saved_value "intstr2.ihex" "reload struct as memory, intel hex" \
- $struct_val "intstruct"
+ $struct_val "\*$struct_ptr_type"
}
# tekhex format can not be loaded for 64-bit-only platforms
if ![string compare $is64bitonly "no"] then {
test_reload_saved_value "intarr1.tekhex" "reload array as value, tekhex" \
- $array_val "intarray"
+ $array_val "\*$array_ptr_type"
test_reload_saved_value "intstr1.tekhex" "reload struct as value, tekhex" \
- $struct_val "intstruct"
+ $struct_val "\*$struct_ptr_type"
test_reload_saved_value "intarr2.tekhex" "reload array as memory, tekhex" \
- $array_val "intarray"
+ $array_val "\*$array_ptr_type"
test_reload_saved_value "intstr2.tekhex" "reload struct as memory, tekhex" \
- $struct_val "intstruct"
+ $struct_val "\*$struct_ptr_type"
}
# Start a fresh gdb session
--
1.7.0.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-23 10:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-21 10:42 [patch 0/2] Fixes to gdb.base/dump.exp Yao Qi
2011-06-21 10:58 ` [patch 1/2] Fixes to gdb.base/dump.exp: get value from address instead of name Yao Qi
2011-06-22 15:45 ` Tom Tromey
2011-06-23 10:28 ` Yao Qi [this message]
2011-07-01 14:16 ` Yao Qi
2011-07-01 14:23 ` Tom Tromey
2011-07-01 16:51 ` [committed] " Yao Qi
2011-06-21 11:05 ` [patch 2/2] Fixes to gdb.base/dump.exp: Combine dump and restore in a single session Yao Qi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E031526.6040309@codesourcery.com \
--to=yao@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox