From: sami wagiaalla <swagiaal@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [patch] PR 11992 "Regression: C++ this scope sometimes does not work"
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 17:51:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C8E3D52.5080005@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100911172806.GA23918@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 461 bytes --]
> [ I would not call it "gcc 4.4.4", it is gcc-4.4.4-10.fc13 which is far from
> FSF GCC 4.4.4. ]
>
Gotcha!
> Anyway while it fixes the problem for me on Fedora 13 x86_64 (and even others)
> the testcase does not FAIL with FSF GDB HEAD (reproducing the problem from
> Dodji as is in the PR).
>
You are right. My bad; I should not have missed that. I fixed the test
case by giving the new functions their own unique names.
I will commit the attached patch
[-- Attachment #2: this_regression.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1973 bytes --]
Fix PR 11992: C++ 'this' scope sometimes does not work
2010-09-13 Sami Wagiaalla <swagiaal@redhat.com>
PR symtab/11992:
* c-exp.y (classify_name): Check is_a_member_of_this before returning
UNKNOWN_CPP_NAME.
2010-09-13 Sami Wagiaalla <swagiaal@redhat.com>
* gdb.cp/koenig.cc: created class for testing member lookup.
* gdb.cp/koenig.exp: Added test for member lookup.
diff --git a/gdb/c-exp.y b/gdb/c-exp.y
index 663e778..57e09b3 100644
--- a/gdb/c-exp.y
+++ b/gdb/c-exp.y
@@ -2389,6 +2389,7 @@ classify_name (struct block *block)
if (sym == NULL
&& parse_language->la_language == language_cplus
+ && !is_a_field_of_this
&& !lookup_minimal_symbol (copy, NULL, NULL))
return UNKNOWN_CPP_NAME;
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/koenig.cc b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/koenig.cc
index c91dbf9..e2190f1 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/koenig.cc
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/koenig.cc
@@ -226,6 +226,16 @@ namespace P {
//------------
+class R {
+ public:
+ int rfoo(){ return 31; }
+ int rbar(){
+ return 1; // marker1
+ }
+};
+
+//------------
+
int
main ()
{
@@ -299,6 +309,10 @@ main ()
++q;
+ R r;
+ r.rbar();
+ r.rfoo();
+
return first (0, c) + foo (eo) +
foo (eo, eo) + foo (eo, eo, 1) +
foo (fo, eo) + foo (1 ,fo, eo) +
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/koenig.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/koenig.exp
index d5e6c3f..34abe77 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/koenig.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/koenig.exp
@@ -115,3 +115,14 @@ gdb_test "p q + 5" "= 29"
# some unary operators for good measure
# Cannot resolve function operator++ to any overloaded instance
gdb_test "p ++q" "= 30"
+
+# Test that koening lookup does not affect
+# member variable lookup.
+gdb_test "p r.rfoo()" "= 31"
+
+# Do the same from inside class R.
+gdb_breakpoint [gdb_get_line_number "marker1"]
+gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "marker1"
+
+gdb_test "p rfoo()" "= 31"
+gdb_test "p this->rfoo()" "= 31"
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-13 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-10 20:30 sami wagiaalla
2010-09-10 20:39 ` Tom Tromey
2010-09-12 18:34 ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-09-13 17:51 ` sami wagiaalla [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C8E3D52.5080005@redhat.com \
--to=swagiaal@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox