From: Phil Muldoon <pmuldoon@redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches ml <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: [python][patch] Return hash value for gdb.Value.
Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 17:05:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BEC3039.2060400@redhat.com> (raw)
This patch implements the hash function for gdb.Value. It purely replicates
the function of id() in that it returns the object address as the hash
value. This allows gdb.Values to be hashable.
Ok?
Cheers,
Phil
--
ChangeLogs
2010-05-13 Phil Muldoon <pmuldoon@redhat.com>
* gdb.python/py-value.exp (test_value_hash): New function.
2010-05-13 Phil Muldoon <pmuldoon@redhat.com>
PR python/11482
* python/py-value.c (valpy_hash): New function.
(value_object_type): Register valpy_hash.
---
diff --git a/gdb/python/py-value.c b/gdb/python/py-value.c
index 173b3c9..2a7f76b 100644
--- a/gdb/python/py-value.c
+++ b/gdb/python/py-value.c
@@ -432,6 +432,13 @@ valpy_get_is_optimized_out (PyObject *self, void *closure)
Py_RETURN_FALSE;
}
+/* Calculate and return the address of the PyObject as the value of
+ the builtin __hash__ call. */
+long valpy_hash (PyObject *self)
+{
+ return (long) (intptr_t) self;
+}
+
enum valpy_opcode
{
VALPY_ADD,
@@ -1097,7 +1104,7 @@ PyTypeObject value_object_type = {
&value_object_as_number, /*tp_as_number*/
0, /*tp_as_sequence*/
&value_object_as_mapping, /*tp_as_mapping*/
- 0, /*tp_hash */
+ valpy_hash, /*tp_hash*/
0, /*tp_call*/
valpy_str, /*tp_str*/
0, /*tp_getattro*/
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-value.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-value.exp
index 3bfa173..67a2ff9 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-value.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-value.exp
@@ -393,6 +393,23 @@ proc test_parse_and_eval {} {
"parse_and_eval type test"
}
+# Test that values are hashable.
+proc test_value_hash {} {
+ gdb_py_test_multiple "Simple Python value dictionary" \
+ "python" "" \
+ "one = gdb.Value(1)" "" \
+ "two = gdb.Value(2)" "" \
+ "three = gdb.Value(3)" "" \
+ "vdict = {one:\"one str\",two:\"two str\",three:\"three str\"}" "" \
+ "end"
+ gdb_test "python print vdict\[one\]" "one str" "Test dictionary hash"
+ gdb_test "python print vdict\[two\]" "two str" "Test dictionary hash"
+ gdb_test "python print vdict\[three\]" "three str" "Test dictionary hash"
+ gdb_test "python print one.__hash__() == hash(one)" "True" "Test inbuilt hash"
+ gdb_test "python print one.__hash__() == id(one)" "True" "Test inbuilt id"
+}
+
+
# Start with a fresh gdb.
gdb_exit
@@ -409,6 +426,7 @@ test_value_boolean
test_value_compare
test_objfiles
test_parse_and_eval
+test_value_hash
# The following tests require execution.
next reply other threads:[~2010-05-13 17:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-13 17:05 Phil Muldoon [this message]
2010-05-13 17:18 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BEC3039.2060400@redhat.com \
--to=pmuldoon@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox