Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Moller <cmoller@redhat.com>
To: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Another obstack patch.
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 14:06:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BD057DF.7070904@redhat.com> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 404 bytes --]

There are two separate recursion control obstacks in cp-valprint.c, both 
originally incorrectly using obstack_next_free().  I fixed one of those 
in the patch for pr9167, but the other one would have collided with the 
patch for pr10687.  Here is the fix for the second instance.  (No new 
testcases are required--the existing t/cs for pr9067, pr9167, and 
pr10687 test the code in this patch.)

Chris


[-- Attachment #2: obstack.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 3186 bytes --]

Index: ChangeLog
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/ChangeLog,v
retrieving revision 1.11667
diff -u -r1.11667 ChangeLog
--- ChangeLog	22 Apr 2010 12:30:54 -0000	1.11667
+++ ChangeLog	22 Apr 2010 13:56:51 -0000
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+2010-04-22  Chris Moller  <cmoller@redhat.com>
+
+	* cp-valprint.c (cp_print_value_fields): Replaced obstack_base()
+        method of popping recursion-detection stack with a method based on
+        obstack_object_size().  (Similar to the PR9167 patch below, but for
+	the static array obstack rather than the static member obstack.)
+
 2010-04-22  Pierre Muller  <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
 
 	PR stabs/11479.
Index: cp-valprint.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/cp-valprint.c,v
retrieving revision 1.66
diff -u -r1.66 cp-valprint.c
--- cp-valprint.c	21 Apr 2010 17:33:54 -0000	1.66
+++ cp-valprint.c	22 Apr 2010 13:56:51 -0000
@@ -81,7 +81,8 @@
 
 static void cp_print_value (struct type *, struct type *, const gdb_byte *,
 			    int, CORE_ADDR, struct ui_file *, int,
-			    const struct value_print_options *, struct type **);
+			    const struct value_print_options *,
+			    struct type **);
 
 
 /* GCC versions after 2.4.5 use this.  */
@@ -186,18 +187,18 @@
     fprintf_filtered (stream, "<No data fields>");
   else
     {
-      int obstack_initial_size = 0;
-      void *stat_array_obstack_top = NULL;
+      int statmem_obstack_initial_size = 0;
+      int stat_array_obstack_initial_size = 0;
       
       if (dont_print_statmem == 0)
 	{
-	  obstack_initial_size =
+	  statmem_obstack_initial_size =
 	    obstack_object_size (&dont_print_statmem_obstack);
 
 	  if (last_set_recurse != recurse)
 	    {
-	      stat_array_obstack_top
-		= obstack_next_free (&dont_print_stat_array_obstack);
+	      stat_array_obstack_initial_size =
+		obstack_object_size (&dont_print_stat_array_obstack);
 	      last_set_recurse = recurse;
 	    }
 	}
@@ -323,12 +324,12 @@
 	  int obstack_final_size =
            obstack_object_size (&dont_print_statmem_obstack);
 
-	  if (obstack_final_size > obstack_initial_size) {
+	  if (obstack_final_size > statmem_obstack_initial_size) {
 	    /* In effect, a pop of the printed-statics stack.  */
 
 	    void *free_to_ptr =
 	      obstack_next_free (&dont_print_statmem_obstack) -
-	      (obstack_final_size - obstack_initial_size);
+	      (obstack_final_size - statmem_obstack_initial_size);
 
 	    obstack_free (&dont_print_statmem_obstack,
 			  free_to_ptr);
@@ -336,9 +337,17 @@
 
 	  if (last_set_recurse != recurse)
 	    {
-	      if (obstack_object_size (&dont_print_stat_array_obstack) > 0) 
+	      int obstack_final_size =
+		obstack_object_size (&dont_print_stat_array_obstack);
+	      
+	      if (obstack_final_size > stat_array_obstack_initial_size) {
+		void *free_to_ptr =
+		  obstack_next_free (&dont_print_stat_array_obstack) -
+		  (obstack_final_size - stat_array_obstack_initial_size);
+
 		obstack_free (&dont_print_stat_array_obstack,
-			      stat_array_obstack_top);
+			      free_to_ptr);
+	      }
 	      last_set_recurse = -1;
 	    }
 	}

[-- Attachment #3: obstack-sum.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1983 bytes --]

--- virgin.sum	2010-04-22 09:38:17.519201307 -0400
+++ patched.sum	2010-04-22 09:49:38.613201404 -0400
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-Test Run By moller on Thu Apr 22 09:04:28 2010
+Test Run By moller on Thu Apr 22 09:40:22 2010
 Native configuration is i686-pc-linux-gnu
 
 		=== gdb tests ===
@@ -5997,7 +5997,7 @@
 PASS: gdb.base/pr11022.exp: watchpoint hit 2
 Running ../../../src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/prelink.exp ...
 PASS: gdb.base/prelink.exp: set verbose on
-FAIL: gdb.base/prelink.exp: prelink
+PASS: gdb.base/prelink.exp: prelink
 Running ../../../src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/printcmds.exp ...
 PASS: gdb.base/printcmds.exp: print $pc
 PASS: gdb.base/printcmds.exp: print "abc"
@@ -13430,7 +13430,7 @@
 PASS: gdb.mi/mi-nsmoribund.exp: resume all, thread specific breakpoint
 PASS: gdb.mi/mi-nsmoribund.exp: hit thread specific breakpoint
 PASS: gdb.mi/mi-nsmoribund.exp: thread state: all running except the breakpoint thread
-FAIL: gdb.mi/mi-nsmoribund.exp: unexpected stop
+PASS: gdb.mi/mi-nsmoribund.exp: resume all, program exited normally
 Running ../../../src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-nsthrexec.exp ...
 PASS: gdb.mi/mi-nsthrexec.exp: successfully compiled posix threads test case
 PASS: gdb.mi/mi-nsthrexec.exp: breakpoint at main
@@ -16468,7 +16468,7 @@
 PASS: gdb.threads/watchthreads.exp: successfully compiled posix threads test case
 PASS: gdb.threads/watchthreads.exp: watch args[0]
 PASS: gdb.threads/watchthreads.exp: watch args[1]
-PASS: gdb.threads/watchthreads.exp: disable 2
+PASS: gdb.threads/watchthreads.exp: disable 3
 PASS: gdb.threads/watchthreads.exp: threaded watch loop
 PASS: gdb.threads/watchthreads.exp: first watchpoint on args[0] hit
 PASS: gdb.threads/watchthreads.exp: first watchpoint on args[1] hit
@@ -16749,8 +16749,8 @@
 
 		=== gdb Summary ===
 
-# of expected passes		15916
-# of unexpected failures	18
+# of expected passes		15918
+# of unexpected failures	16
 # of expected failures		44
 # of untested testcases		6
 # of unsupported tests		62

             reply	other threads:[~2010-04-22 14:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-22 14:06 Chris Moller [this message]
2010-04-22 19:04 ` Tom Tromey
2010-04-22 20:13   ` Chris Moller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BD057DF.7070904@redhat.com \
    --to=cmoller@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox