Re: [patch] gdbserver: Add support for Z0/Z1 packets

[Aleksandar Ristovski <aristovski@qnx.com>]

Pedro Alves wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 June 2009 16:17:58, Aleksandar Ristovski wrote:
>> Pedro Alves wrote:
>>> On Monday 22 June 2009 20:38:50, Aleksandar Ristovski wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Z0 and Z1 breakpoints also take a 'len' argument, just
>>>>> like Z2-Z4.  You should also pass those down.
>>>>>
>>>>> But, Let's take a step back --- why not just rename the
>>>>> insert_watchpoint|remove_watchpoint functions to insert_point,remove_point,
>>>>> and relax the type checks in server.c:
> 
>>>> But either way is fine with me - just let me know.
>>> I'd prefer the approach I suggested, and worry about splitting
>>> the breakpoints from watchpoints API if/when we actually need it.
>>>
>> Ok, then that version is committed.
> 
> Well, we had never seen "that" version, and you bypassed
> the "rename" suggestion...

This version is the previous one with the changes you 
suggested (minus renaming).

> 
> Would you care to explain why are watchpoints guarded on
> require_running and breakpoints aren't?  It's not super
> obvious to me.

Hmm... you mean we should probably guard all? You are 
probably right.

In any case - advise on next step:
-revert
-rename
-rename + guard

Thanks,

Aleksandar