Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Aleksandar Ristovski <aristovski@qnx.com>,  Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] gdbserver: Add support for Z0/Z1 packets
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 22:46:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200906222346.54263.pedro@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A3FDDCA.2010106@qnx.com>

On Monday 22 June 2009 20:38:50, Aleksandar Ristovski wrote:

> > Z0 and Z1 breakpoints also take a 'len' argument, just
> > like Z2-Z4.  You should also pass those down.
> > 
> > But, Let's take a step back --- why not just rename the
> > insert_watchpoint|remove_watchpoint functions to insert_point,remove_point,
> > and relax the type checks in server.c:
> 
> That was my initial implementation, prior to proposing the 
> change. Then I looked at target ops in gdb; there we have 
> two different functions for breakpoint and watchpoint so I 
> followed that logic (even though the logic there seems to be 
> incomplete: there is a pair for hw and non-hw breakponts but 
> only one pair for watchpoints).

That's because software watchpoints aren't "inserted".  Instead,
GDB forces the target to single-step all the way (see
bpstat_should_step calls in infrun.c), and evaluates the
watchpoints expressions for changes at each step.

> But either way is fine with me - just let me know.

I'd prefer the approach I suggested, and worry about splitting
the breakpoints from watchpoints API if/when we actually need it.

-- 
Pedro Alves


  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-22 22:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-17  1:20 Aleksandar Ristovski
2009-06-17  1:35 ` Aleksandar Ristovski
2009-06-19  7:08   ` Doug Evans
2009-06-19 13:56     ` Aleksandar Ristovski
2009-06-20 22:01       ` Pedro Alves
2009-06-22 19:39         ` Aleksandar Ristovski
2009-06-22 22:46           ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2009-06-23 15:18             ` Aleksandar Ristovski
2009-06-23 15:59               ` Pedro Alves
2009-06-23 16:57                 ` Aleksandar Ristovski
2009-06-24 18:51                 ` Aleksandar Ristovski
2009-06-24 19:01                   ` Doug Evans
2009-06-24 19:04                     ` Aleksandar Ristovski
2009-06-24 19:10                       ` Doug Evans
2009-06-24 19:10                   ` Pedro Alves
2009-06-24 19:20                     ` Aleksandar Ristovski
2009-06-24 19:28                       ` Pedro Alves
2009-06-24 19:25                     ` Aleksandar Ristovski
2009-06-25 22:18                       ` Pedro Alves

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200906222346.54263.pedro@codesourcery.com \
    --to=pedro@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=aristovski@qnx.com \
    --cc=dje@google.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox