From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Fix "list ambiguous_variable"
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 15:25:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49a8a021-3d9f-c5f1-9cc4-dae1f32c7d01@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ce2d9562-7d1a-1e87-e2cf-abdb18a57fef@redhat.com>
On 09/06/2017 07:41 PM, Keith Seitz wrote:
> On 09/04/2017 11:47 AM, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> The "list" command allows specifying the name of variables as
>> argument, not just functions, so that users can type "list
>> a_global_variable".
>>
>> That support is a broken when it comes to ambiguous locations though.
>
> Very nice!
>
> FWIW, I have only one trivial nit (below).
>
> Keith
>
> PS. Out of curiosity, I hacked up a test program with multiple symbols named "ambiguous," both functions and variables. Well done!
Awesome. :-)
>
> (gdb) set listsize 3
> (gdb) list ambiguous
> file: "amb1.c", line number: 5, symbol: "ambiguous"
> 4
> 5 static int ambiguous = 0;
> 6
> file: "amb2.c", line number: 3, symbol: "ambiguous"
> 2 ambiguous (void)
> 3 {
> 4 return 0;
> file: "amb3.c", line number: 3, symbol: "ambiguous"
> 2 ambiguous (void)
> 3 {
> 4 return 0;
> file: "amb4.c", line number: 1, symbol: "ambiguous"
> 1 static int ambiguous = 0;
> 2
> 3 int
>
>> - /* The minimal symbol might point to a function descriptor;
>> - resolve it to the actual code address instead. */
>> - pc = gdbarch_convert_from_func_ptr_addr (gdbarch, sal.pc, ¤t_target);
>> - if (pc != sal.pc)
>> - sal = find_pc_sect_line (pc, NULL, 0);
>> + /* The minimal symbol might point to a function descriptor;
>> + resolve it to the actual code address instead. */
>> + pc = gdbarch_convert_from_func_ptr_addr (gdbarch, sal.pc, ¤t_target);
>
> This line exceeds the 80-char line length limit.
Indeed it does. Fixed before pushing (both patches).
Thanks for the review!
--
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-20 15:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-04 18:47 [PATCH 0/2] Make "list ambiguous" show symbol names too Pedro Alves
2017-09-04 18:47 ` [PATCH 2/2] " Pedro Alves
2017-09-06 18:43 ` Keith Seitz
2017-09-04 18:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] Fix "list ambiguous_variable" Pedro Alves
2017-09-06 18:41 ` Keith Seitz
2017-09-20 15:25 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2017-10-16 15:03 ` Simon Marchi
2017-11-25 7:40 ` ppc64 regression: " Jan Kratochvil
2017-11-26 16:38 ` Ulrich Weigand
2017-11-29 19:08 ` [PATCH] Fix setting-breakpoints regression on PPC64 (function descriptors) (was: Re: ppc64 regression: [PATCH 1/2] Fix "list ambiguous_variable") Pedro Alves
2017-11-29 19:20 ` [PATCH] Fix setting-breakpoints regression on PPC64 (function descriptors) (was: Re: ppc64 regression: [PATCH 1/2] Fix "list amb Ulrich Weigand
2017-11-29 19:28 ` Pedro Alves
2017-12-08 9:44 ` [PATCH] Fix setting-breakpoints regression on PPC64 (function descriptors) Yao Qi
2017-12-08 11:34 ` Pedro Alves
2017-12-08 16:57 ` Yao Qi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49a8a021-3d9f-c5f1-9cc4-dae1f32c7d01@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=keiths@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox