Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Dallaway <jld@ecoscentric.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>, Doug Evans <dje@google.com>,
	  Stan Shebs <stan@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Bart Veer <bartv@ecoscentric.com>
Subject: Re: add file I/O support when debugging an embedded target via jtag
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 11:59:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48F87E04.8070000@ecoscentric.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pnej2pzobz.fsf@delenn.bartv.net>

Daniel, Stan and Doug

Thank you for your comments on Bart Veer's original proposal and
subsequent patch for file I/O support when debugging via JTAG.

Proposal: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2008-07/msg00045.html
Patch: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-08/msg00315.html

We now need to draw this to a conclusion and move on.

The principle objection to the patch is that it introduces a new target
ops stratum which might break other configurations or impede future
developments. During our initial investigation we came to the conclusion
that introducing a new stratum was the most elegant way to implement
this functionality in a generic manner. In his response to the original
proposal, Daniel wrote:

> It's sad that you need to use the target strata for this.  Doing it
> directly in the remote target would work for all of the above except
> for "target bdm".  But I suppose it's reasonable.

Is there anything we can now do to make the patch acceptable short of a
re-implemention to avoid introducing a new stratum?

John Dallaway
eCosCentric Limited


  reply	other threads:[~2008-10-17 11:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-12 16:34 Bart Veer
2008-08-12 19:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-08-31 11:42   ` Bart Veer
2008-08-31 14:36     ` Stan Shebs
2008-08-31 15:39       ` Bart Veer
2008-09-23 10:15         ` Bart Veer
2008-09-23 12:03           ` Doug Evans
2008-09-24 21:21             ` Bart Veer
2008-09-25 17:05               ` Doug Evans
2008-09-25 20:27                 ` Bart Veer
2008-09-25 22:20                   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-10-01 18:39                     ` Bart Veer
2008-10-01 21:10                       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-10-09 17:11                         ` Bart Veer
2008-10-17 11:59                           ` John Dallaway [this message]
2008-09-01  3:07     ` Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48F87E04.8070000@ecoscentric.com \
    --to=jld@ecoscentric.com \
    --cc=bartv@ecoscentric.com \
    --cc=dje@google.com \
    --cc=drow@false.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=stan@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox