From: Markus Deuling <deuling@de.ibm.com>
To: Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>,
Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>,
Jim Blandy <jimb@codesourcery.com>
Cc: GDB Patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [rfc] Wrap addresses in spu-gdb
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2007 10:39:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46BAEE8B.9060907@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200708081411.l78EBqII022771@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1139 bytes --]
Hi,
Ulrich Weigand schrieb:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 08:44:29AM +0200, Markus Deuling wrote:
>>> + if (target_has_registers && target_has_stack && target_has_memory
>>> + /* FIXME: Currently needed for dwarf2_read_address to work. */
>>> + && type != builtin_type_uint32)
>> I think that you shouldn't commit a patch with this hack in it.
>> It looks very fragile.
>
> Agreed. Markus, this is a special hack for the combined PPE/SPE
> debugger, it shouldn't be necessary for the SPU-standalone (and
> mainline) version.
>
> I'll have to look into fixing the underlying issue cleanly when
> merging the combined debugger ...
ok, thank you. I attached a patch with a SPU-only version. This can
later be replaced by the version suitable for the combined debugger.
Tested on spu-elf without regression.
ChangeLog:
* spu-tdep.c (spu_pointer_to_address): New function.
(spu_integer_to_address): Likewise.
(spu_gdbarch_init): Add spu_pointer_to_address and
spu_integer_to_address to gdbarch.
Is this ok to commit?
--
Markus Deuling
GNU Toolchain for Linux on Cell BE
deuling@de.ibm.com
[-- Attachment #2: diff-spu-wrap-addr --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1717 bytes --]
diff -urpN src/gdb/spu-tdep.c dev/gdb/spu-tdep.c
--- src/gdb/spu-tdep.c 2007-06-18 05:36:44.000000000 +0200
+++ dev/gdb/spu-tdep.c 2007-08-09 12:13:20.000000000 +0200
@@ -324,6 +324,35 @@ spu_register_reggroup_p (struct gdbarch
return default_register_reggroup_p (gdbarch, regnum, group);
}
+/* Address conversion. */
+
+static CORE_ADDR
+spu_pointer_to_address (struct type *type, const gdb_byte *buf)
+{
+ ULONGEST addr = extract_unsigned_integer (buf, TYPE_LENGTH (type));
+ ULONGEST lslr = SPU_LS_SIZE - 1; /* Hard-wired LS size. */
+
+ if (target_has_registers && target_has_stack && target_has_memory)
+ lslr = get_frame_register_unsigned (get_selected_frame (NULL),
+ SPU_LSLR_REGNUM);
+
+ return addr & lslr;
+}
+
+static CORE_ADDR
+spu_integer_to_address (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
+ struct type *type, const gdb_byte *buf)
+{
+ ULONGEST addr = unpack_long (type, buf);
+ ULONGEST lslr = SPU_LS_SIZE - 1; /* Hard-wired LS size. */
+
+ if (target_has_registers && target_has_stack && target_has_memory)
+ lslr = get_frame_register_unsigned (get_selected_frame (NULL),
+ SPU_LSLR_REGNUM);
+
+ return addr & lslr;
+}
+
/* Decoding SPU instructions. */
@@ -2008,6 +2037,10 @@ spu_gdbarch_init (struct gdbarch_info in
set_gdbarch_double_format (gdbarch, floatformats_ieee_double);
set_gdbarch_long_double_format (gdbarch, floatformats_ieee_double);
+ /* Address conversion. */
+ set_gdbarch_pointer_to_address (gdbarch, spu_pointer_to_address);
+ set_gdbarch_integer_to_address (gdbarch, spu_integer_to_address);
+
/* Inferior function calls. */
set_gdbarch_call_dummy_location (gdbarch, ON_STACK);
set_gdbarch_frame_align (gdbarch, spu_frame_align);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-09 10:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-08 6:46 Markus Deuling
2007-08-08 11:42 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-08-08 14:12 ` Ulrich Weigand
2007-08-08 17:10 ` Jim Blandy
2007-08-09 10:39 ` Markus Deuling [this message]
2007-08-20 18:42 ` Ulrich Weigand
2007-08-21 9:57 ` Markus Deuling
2007-08-21 11:14 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-08-27 13:01 ` Markus Deuling
2007-08-27 14:32 ` Ulrich Weigand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46BAEE8B.9060907@de.ibm.com \
--to=deuling@de.ibm.com \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jimb@codesourcery.com \
--cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox