Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: Patch to update libtool in GCC and binutils trees
@ 2007-03-23  7:29 Paolo Bonzini
       [not found] ` <200703231550.IAA20980@hpsje.cup.hp.com>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2007-03-23  7:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Steve Ellcey, David Edelsohn, GCC Patches, binutils, gdb-patches, newlib

Steve Ellcey wrote:

> Here is a patch to update the libtool in the GCC and src trees to the
> ToT libtool.

Please add a comment in libgfortran/Makefile.am.

Also, please resend with the libtool code to help people test the
precise version you'll commit. (*)  In particular, David, I'd
appreciate if you could test AIX before the commit.

I guess you can do HP-UX yourself, I'll do i686-linux as soon as
you post the updated patch.  I'll also try a combined tree with
newlib on arm-elf next week.  Please wait for these tests to
be finished before committing, as the patch seems pretty easy
to maintain.

Thanks very much for this work!

Paolo

(*) sending this first round without libtool was a good idea though


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Patch to update libtool in GCC and binutils trees
       [not found] ` <200703231550.IAA20980@hpsje.cup.hp.com>
@ 2007-03-23 16:12   ` François-Xavier Coudert
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: François-Xavier Coudert @ 2007-03-23 16:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Steve Ellcey; +Cc: bonzini, dje, gcc-patches, binutils, gdb-patches, newlib

> FX, I am not going to send out the generated files because that whould
> just be too big of a patch.

What are the tool versions required to regenerate everything? Are
there special command lines to be issued, or just ./configure
--enable-maintainer-mode?

FX


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Patch to update libtool in GCC and binutils trees
  2007-03-26 16:32 ` Steve Ellcey
@ 2007-03-26 17:31   ` Paolo Bonzini
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2007-03-26 17:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Steve Ellcey; +Cc: gcc-patches, binutils, gdb-patches, newlib

Steve Ellcey wrote:
> I tested the new libtool on HP-UX and Linux over the weekend.  The
> builds all worked fine but I got many C++ failures during testing on
> IA64 HP-UX, PA HP-UX (32 bits), and x86_64 Linux.  All the failures
> seemed to involve trouble finding the libstdc++ library when linking
> test programs.  On IA64 HP-UX, testing worked in default 32 bit mode but
> failed in 64 bit mode because we have a -L that finds the 32 bit
> libstdc++ library before one that finds the 64 bit version.  On PA and
> x86_64, we just don't seem to find libstdc++ at all.
> 
> I'll see if I can figure out what is going on.

Thanks.  By the way, next time it's best if you don't post the
new libtool files as a patch, but just attach them or a .tar.gz
of them.  Just post the configure.ac/Makefile.am changes as diffs.

Sorry for not asking for this the previous time.

Paolo


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Patch to update libtool in GCC and binutils trees
  2007-03-23 16:22 Steve Ellcey
@ 2007-03-26 16:32 ` Steve Ellcey
  2007-03-26 17:31   ` Paolo Bonzini
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Steve Ellcey @ 2007-03-26 16:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-patches, binutils, gdb-patches, newlib, bonzini

I tested the new libtool on HP-UX and Linux over the weekend.  The
builds all worked fine but I got many C++ failures during testing on
IA64 HP-UX, PA HP-UX (32 bits), and x86_64 Linux.  All the failures
seemed to involve trouble finding the libstdc++ library when linking
test programs.  On IA64 HP-UX, testing worked in default 32 bit mode but
failed in 64 bit mode because we have a -L that finds the 32 bit
libstdc++ library before one that finds the 64 bit version.  On PA and
x86_64, we just don't seem to find libstdc++ at all.

I'll see if I can figure out what is going on.

Steve Ellcey
sje@cup.hp.com


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Patch to update libtool in GCC and binutils trees
@ 2007-03-23 16:22 Steve Ellcey
  2007-03-26 16:32 ` Steve Ellcey
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Steve Ellcey @ 2007-03-23 16:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-patches, binutils, gdb-patches

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 353 bytes --]

This is a follow up patch with the libtool changes for the top-level of 
the GCC and binutils tree.  My first attempt to send this bounced 
because the patch was too big.  Here is is as a compressed attachment. 
The patch does not delete ltconfig, ltcf-c.sh, ltcf-cxx.sh, and 
ltcf-gcj.sh.  That needs to be done by hand.

Steve Ellcey
sje@cup.hp.com



[-- Attachment #2: Top --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 352 bytes --]

2007-03-22  Steve Ellcey  <sje@cup.hp.com>
	* ltmain.sh: Update from ToT Libtool.
	* libtool.m4: Update from ToT Libtool.
	* ltsugar.m4: New. Update from ToT Libtool.
	* ltversion.m4: New. Update from ToT Libtool.
	* ltoptions.m4: New. Update from ToT Libtool.
	* ltconfig: Remove.
	* ltcf-c.sh: Remove.
	* ltcf-cxx.sh: Remove.
	* ltcf-gcj.sh: Remove.

[-- Attachment #3: libtool.diff.gz --]
[-- Type: application/x-gzip, Size: 162357 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-03-26 17:31 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-03-23  7:29 Patch to update libtool in GCC and binutils trees Paolo Bonzini
     [not found] ` <200703231550.IAA20980@hpsje.cup.hp.com>
2007-03-23 16:12   ` François-Xavier Coudert
2007-03-23 16:22 Steve Ellcey
2007-03-26 16:32 ` Steve Ellcey
2007-03-26 17:31   ` Paolo Bonzini

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox