Re: Xtensa port

[Maxim Grigoriev <maxim@tensilica.com>]

Michael,

Thanks much for the quick response.
> At a quick first glance, it looks pretty good.
> Do you have a copyright assignment on file
>   
Once in a while, Daniel Jacobowitz mentioned that he has all the 
necessary paper work for Xtensa port. I hope it still true.
> One question -- is there a reason for splitting xtensa-config.c 
> into a separate file?  Not necessarily a problem, but it seems
> to be mostly stuff that would traditionally go in the xxx-tdep.c
> file (such as the struct gdbarch_tdep object).
>   
It's because Xtensa is all about configurability. Historically, 
Tensilica uses a special configuration called FSF for all our FSF 
submissions. It's been used for Xtensa GCC and BFD work. Now, I'm trying 
to use it for GDB. So when we have to deal with a different 
configuration of the Xtensa processor all we need is to update 
xtensa-config.c file.

-- Maxim