Re: [RFA] set/unset/show substitute-path commands (take 2)

[Andrew STUBBS <andrew.stubbs@st.com>]

Joel Brobecker wrote:
> +  /* If the list of rules are empty, then insert the new rule
> +     at the head of the list.  */
> +
> +  if (substitute_path_rules == NULL)
> +    {
> +      substitute_path_rules = rule;
> +      return;
> +    }
> +
> +  /* Otherwise, skip to the last rule in our list and then append
> +     the new rule.  */
> +
> +  last = substitute_path_rules;
> +  while (last->next != NULL)
> +    last = last->next;
> +
> +  last->next = rule;

What if the user tries to substitute the same path twice? I think it 
should delete the old rule (maybe query) and add the new one to the end.

> +  /* If no rule matching the argument was found, then print an error
> +     message to the user.  */
> +
> +  if (!rule_found)
> +    {
> +      if (from != NULL)
> +        error (_("No substitution rule defined for `%s'"), from);
> +      else
> +        error (_("No substitution rule defined"));

Is the latter case really an error? I would have thought not, since 
there's no way for a script to check the status before giving the command.

Andrew