Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [RFA] Update copyright dates in gdb.texinfo
@ 2006-03-31  8:03 Michael Snyder
  2006-03-31 10:40 ` Eli Zaretskii
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Michael Snyder @ 2006-03-31  8:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Eli Zaretskii, GDB Patches

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 9 bytes --]

Ok Eli?


[-- Attachment #2: doc --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2604 bytes --]

2006-03-30  Michael Snyder  <msnyder@redhat.com>

	* gdb.texinfo: Update copyright dates.

Index: gdb.texinfo
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo,v
retrieving revision 1.318
diff -p -r1.318 gdb.texinfo
*** gdb.texinfo	29 Mar 2006 22:58:55 -0000	1.318
--- gdb.texinfo	31 Mar 2006 02:04:07 -0000
***************
*** 1,6 ****
  \input texinfo      @c -*-texinfo-*-
  @c Copyright (C) 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1998,
! @c 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005
  @c Free Software Foundation, Inc.
  @c
  @c %**start of header
--- 1,6 ----
  \input texinfo      @c -*-texinfo-*-
  @c Copyright (C) 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1998,
! @c 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006
  @c Free Software Foundation, Inc.
  @c
  @c %**start of header
*************** This is the @value{EDITION} Edition, of 
*** 52,58 ****
  Version @value{GDBVN}.
  
  Copyright (C) 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1998,@*
!               1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005@*
                Free Software Foundation, Inc.
  
  Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
--- 52,58 ----
  Version @value{GDBVN}.
  
  Copyright (C) 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1998,@*
!               1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006@*
                Free Software Foundation, Inc.
  
  Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
*************** development.''
*** 85,91 ****
  
  @vskip 0pt plus 1filll
  Copyright @copyright{} 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995,
! 1996, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005 
  Free Software Foundation, Inc.
  @sp 2
  Published by the Free Software Foundation @*
--- 85,91 ----
  
  @vskip 0pt plus 1filll
  Copyright @copyright{} 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995,
! 1996, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2006 
  Free Software Foundation, Inc.
  @sp 2
  Published by the Free Software Foundation @*
*************** This file describes @value{GDBN}, the @s
*** 117,123 ****
  This is the @value{EDITION} Edition, for @value{GDBN} Version
  @value{GDBVN}.
  
! Copyright (C) 1988-2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
  
  @menu
  * Summary::                     Summary of @value{GDBN}
--- 117,123 ----
  This is the @value{EDITION} Edition, for @value{GDBN} Version
  @value{GDBVN}.
  
! Copyright (C) 1988-2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
  
  @menu
  * Summary::                     Summary of @value{GDBN}

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFA] Update copyright dates in gdb.texinfo
  2006-03-31  8:03 [RFA] Update copyright dates in gdb.texinfo Michael Snyder
@ 2006-03-31 10:40 ` Eli Zaretskii
  2006-03-31 19:47   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2006-03-31 10:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael Snyder; +Cc: gdb-patches

> Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 18:05:28 -0800
> From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
> 
> Ok Eli?

Yes, thanks.  But I thought we all agreed that copyright years need to
be changed only as part of preparing a release, and that at that time
all files need to be stamped with the release year.  Did I miss
something?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFA] Update copyright dates in gdb.texinfo
  2006-03-31 10:40 ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2006-03-31 19:47   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
  2006-03-31 22:17     ` Eli Zaretskii
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2006-03-31 19:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: Michael Snyder, gdb-patches

On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 11:00:13AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 18:05:28 -0800
> > From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
> > 
> > Ok Eli?
> 
> Yes, thanks.  But I thought we all agreed that copyright years need to
> be changed only as part of preparing a release, and that at that time
> all files need to be stamped with the release year.  Did I miss
> something?

Isn't it the other way around?  We can gratuitously bump the copyright
year on files, and the FSF even recommends it, but CVS counts as "a
release" for the FSF's copyright purposes.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFA] Update copyright dates in gdb.texinfo
  2006-03-31 19:47   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
@ 2006-03-31 22:17     ` Eli Zaretskii
  2006-03-31 22:19       ` Michael Snyder
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2006-03-31 22:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael Snyder, gdb-patches

> Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 08:55:51 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
> 
> > Yes, thanks.  But I thought we all agreed that copyright years need to
> > be changed only as part of preparing a release, and that at that time
> > all files need to be stamped with the release year.  Did I miss
> > something?
> 
> Isn't it the other way around?

I didn't think it was.

Anyone, this is nothing worth arguing about.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFA] Update copyright dates in gdb.texinfo
  2006-03-31 22:17     ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2006-03-31 22:19       ` Michael Snyder
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Michael Snyder @ 2006-03-31 22:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: gdb-patches

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 08:55:51 -0500
>>From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
>>Cc: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
>>
>>
>>>Yes, thanks.  But I thought we all agreed that copyright years need to
>>>be changed only as part of preparing a release, and that at that time
>>>all files need to be stamped with the release year.  Did I miss
>>>something?
>>
>>Isn't it the other way around?
> 
> 
> I didn't think it was.
> 
> Anyone, this is nothing worth arguing about.
> 

Anyway, committed.
Thanks.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2006-03-31 19:47 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-03-31  8:03 [RFA] Update copyright dates in gdb.texinfo Michael Snyder
2006-03-31 10:40 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-03-31 19:47   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-03-31 22:17     ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-03-31 22:19       ` Michael Snyder

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox