Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
To: Jim Blandy <jimb@red-bean.com>
Cc: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>,
	fnf@specifix.com, drow@false.org,
	        gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix problem with scope.exp test, skipping past init0  call
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 00:01:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <440635D0.1050704@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8f2776cb0602130947s56ed2f8bs3b66049e8e4c89a3@mail.gmail.com>

Jim Blandy wrote:
> Actually, having seen other's responses here, I'm inclined to say that
> the proper fix is to simply drop the code in scope.exp for getting
> from the opening brace to the first line.  Setting a breakpoint on
> main simply shouldn't leave you on the opening brace, and that test
> suite logic has always been papering over a bug.
> 
> If prologues contain calls to __main, then the prologue analyzers
> should skip them.

Are you sure?  If skipping __main involves overhead,
do you want to incur that overhead every time we want
to skip a prologue?


  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-03-02  0:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-12 20:10 Fred Fish
2006-02-13  6:16 ` Jim Blandy
2006-02-13 15:39 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-13 15:47   ` Fred Fish
2006-02-13 15:53     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-13 16:05     ` Mark Kettenis
2006-02-13 16:08       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-13 16:19       ` Fred Fish
2006-02-13 16:49         ` Mark Kettenis
2006-02-13 17:47           ` Jim Blandy
2006-02-13 17:54             ` Jim Blandy
2006-02-13 17:57               ` Jim Blandy
2006-02-13 18:08                 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-03-02  0:01             ` Michael Snyder [this message]
2006-03-02  6:09               ` Jim Blandy
2006-02-13 18:39           ` Fred Fish

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=440635D0.1050704@redhat.com \
    --to=msnyder@redhat.com \
    --cc=drow@false.org \
    --cc=fnf@specifix.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=jimb@red-bean.com \
    --cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox