Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,  gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: PATCH: Support Windows in event-loop.c
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 21:15:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <426817F0.5070404@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050421205617.GA13146@nevyn.them.org>

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

> Anyway, if Mark can come up with a select wrapper, then maybe we can
> drop the question entirely.

I'm sure I can, if that's the only way to get this functionality into 
GDB.  But, the emacs select wrapper is hardly a full implementation of 
select; for example, it only handles file descriptors waiting for 
"read", not "write".  To me, adding a partial emulation of a POSIX 
function, without real POSIX semantics and behavior, is confusing.  And 
adding a full emulation is going to be a lot more code than the present 
change -- and will perform worse to boot.

Windows isn't UNIX, and waiting for activity on file descriptors is one 
of the places where Windows made some rather different choices.  This is 
a low-level system-programming code, and so system details appear.  It's 
like dealing with different rules for interruptable syscalls, different 
signal-handling rules, and so forth.

Fortunately, it doesn't look like event-loop.c is a very active area of 
development.  It looks like the last substantive change was on 
2002-05-14.  It seems unlikely to me that this change is going to make 
it a lot harder for people to make other improvements to event-loop.c.

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com
(916) 791-8304


  reply	other threads:[~2005-04-21 21:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-04-21  5:53 Mark Mitchell
2005-04-21 18:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-21 18:49   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-04-21 18:56   ` Mark Mitchell
2005-04-21 20:30     ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-21 20:56       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-04-21 21:15         ` Mark Mitchell [this message]
2005-04-22  8:26           ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-22 12:08             ` Christopher Faylor
2005-04-22 13:23               ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-22 15:04                 ` Christopher Faylor
2005-04-22 15:14                   ` Ian Lance Taylor
2005-04-22 15:28                     ` Christopher Faylor
2005-04-22 15:52               ` Mark Mitchell
2005-04-22  8:16         ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-24 22:18           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-04-24 22:30             ` Mark Kettenis
2005-04-25  0:04               ` Mark Mitchell
2005-04-24 23:57             ` Mark Mitchell
2005-04-25  4:25               ` Christopher Faylor
2005-04-25 13:16                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-04-25 14:50                   ` Christopher Faylor
2005-04-25 14:59                     ` Mark Mitchell
2005-04-25 15:04                       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-04-25 15:18                         ` Mark Mitchell
2005-04-25 15:23                           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-04-25 15:26                             ` Mark Mitchell
2005-04-25 15:36                               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-04-25 16:44                                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-25 20:23                                 ` Mark Mitchell
2005-04-25 21:07                                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-25 21:49                                     ` Mark Mitchell
2005-04-25 22:00                                       ` Mark Kettenis
2005-04-25 22:09                                         ` Mark Mitchell
2005-04-25 22:29                                           ` Mark Kettenis
2005-04-25 22:47                                             ` Mark Mitchell
2005-04-26  3:55                                             ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-25 23:16                                       ` Christopher Faylor
2005-04-25 23:20                                         ` Mark Mitchell
2005-04-25 23:33                                           ` Christopher Faylor
2005-04-26  0:21                                             ` Mark Mitchell
2005-04-26  3:58                                           ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-26  3:59                                             ` Mark Mitchell
2005-04-25 15:50                               ` Ian Lance Taylor
2005-04-26  3:49                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-26 13:17                           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-04-25 15:52                     ` M.M. Kettenis
2005-04-25 16:00                       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-04-25 16:08                       ` Ian Lance Taylor
2005-04-25 16:24                         ` Christopher Faylor
2005-04-25 17:08                       ` Mark Mitchell
2005-04-25 21:04                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-25 16:42                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-21 21:01     ` Christopher Faylor
2005-04-21 21:03       ` Christopher Faylor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=426817F0.5070404@codesourcery.com \
    --to=mark@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=drow@false.org \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox