From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: PATCH: Support Windows in event-loop.c
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 22:18:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050424221806.GA13942@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01c54713$Blat.v2.4$5d0b4ea0@zahav.net.il>
On Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 11:13:51AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > How does the fact that only Windows provides WaitForMultipleObjects
> > make it conceptually different from the fact that a bunch of systems
> > provide poll, and a bunch don't?
>
> The difference is that `select' and `poll' are both Posix functions,
> while WaitForMultipleObjects is MS-Windows specific.
I guess I don't see this as a problem, while you do. In any case,
since Chris has raised technical objections, I'm going to sit back and
see what the next revision looks like. Hopefully it will make us both
happier.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-24 22:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-21 5:53 Mark Mitchell
2005-04-21 18:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-21 18:49 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-04-21 18:56 ` Mark Mitchell
2005-04-21 20:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-21 20:56 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-04-21 21:15 ` Mark Mitchell
2005-04-22 8:26 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-22 12:08 ` Christopher Faylor
2005-04-22 13:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-22 15:04 ` Christopher Faylor
2005-04-22 15:14 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2005-04-22 15:28 ` Christopher Faylor
2005-04-22 15:52 ` Mark Mitchell
2005-04-22 8:16 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-24 22:18 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2005-04-24 22:30 ` Mark Kettenis
2005-04-25 0:04 ` Mark Mitchell
2005-04-24 23:57 ` Mark Mitchell
2005-04-25 4:25 ` Christopher Faylor
2005-04-25 13:16 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-04-25 14:50 ` Christopher Faylor
2005-04-25 14:59 ` Mark Mitchell
2005-04-25 15:04 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-04-25 15:18 ` Mark Mitchell
2005-04-25 15:23 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-04-25 15:26 ` Mark Mitchell
2005-04-25 15:36 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-04-25 16:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-25 20:23 ` Mark Mitchell
2005-04-25 21:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-25 21:49 ` Mark Mitchell
2005-04-25 22:00 ` Mark Kettenis
2005-04-25 22:09 ` Mark Mitchell
2005-04-25 22:29 ` Mark Kettenis
2005-04-25 22:47 ` Mark Mitchell
2005-04-26 3:55 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-25 23:16 ` Christopher Faylor
2005-04-25 23:20 ` Mark Mitchell
2005-04-25 23:33 ` Christopher Faylor
2005-04-26 0:21 ` Mark Mitchell
2005-04-26 3:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-26 3:59 ` Mark Mitchell
2005-04-25 15:50 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2005-04-26 3:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-26 13:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-04-25 15:52 ` M.M. Kettenis
2005-04-25 16:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-04-25 16:08 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2005-04-25 16:24 ` Christopher Faylor
2005-04-25 17:08 ` Mark Mitchell
2005-04-25 21:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-25 16:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-21 21:01 ` Christopher Faylor
2005-04-21 21:03 ` Christopher Faylor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050424221806.GA13942@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=mark@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox