Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
To: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com,  gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com,
	 newlib@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Dejagnu: use -isystem to include system header files.
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 09:15:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <419C6925.8010007@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1100713585.23221.6.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com>

Hi Richard,

> Nick Clifton wrote:
>         I am going to check in the attached patch which imports a fix from
>         the mainline dejagnu sources.  This fix is to use the -isystem
>         switch to include system header files rather than -I.  This fixes
>         several unexpected failures in the GCC and G++ testsuites where the
>         newlib system header file <limits.h> is included in strict ANSI
>         mode, and the compiler barfs on the #include_next directive.
>         
> Unfortunately this patch causes regressions on the gcc builtins tests. 
> These tests rely on detecting newlib by looking for the definition of
> _NEWLIB_VERSION being added by including limits.h; but the change in the
> search order means that we now pick up a dummy version of newlib.h from
> the gcc include directory.  
> 
> With your patch the search path has now become
> 
>  /work/rearnsha/gnu/egcs/gcc/include
>  /work/rearnsha/gnu/egcs/arm-elf/./newlib/targ-include
>  /home/rearnsha/gnusrc/egcs-cross/newlib/libc/include
> 
> Whereas previously the gcc/include directory came later in the search.

Hmmm, maybe newlib could provide the "l" variants of the builtin 
functions ?  What are these functions anyway ?  Or maybe 
builtins-config.h could include say <stdio.h> rather than <limits.h> so 
that it would pickup the newlib version and not the gcc version ?

Alternatively - can you think of another way of solving the problem that 
my patch was originally fixing ?  Namely that several GCC and G++ tests 
fail because they include <limits.h> whilst in strict ANSI mode and this 
fails because the newlib limits.h uses the GNU extension #include_next 
directive.  My first patch to solve this -  by undefining __GNUC__ if 
__STRICT_ANSI__ was defined was rejected on the gcc lists.

Cheers
   Nick


  reply	other threads:[~2004-11-18  9:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-11-17 17:47 Richard Earnshaw
2004-11-18  9:15 ` Nick Clifton [this message]
2004-11-18 11:15   ` Richard Earnshaw
2004-11-18 15:56     ` Nick Clifton
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-11-18 20:07 Richard Earnshaw
2004-11-22 14:05 ` Nick Clifton
     [not found] <m3pt2koaw8.fsf@redhat.com>
2004-11-11 14:22 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-11-11 15:54   ` Nick Clifton
2004-11-11 17:00     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-11-12  0:25   ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2004-11-12  0:29     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-11-12  1:30       ` Zack Weinberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=419C6925.8010007@redhat.com \
    --to=nickc@redhat.com \
    --cc=binutils@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=newlib@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox