From: Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
To: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com,
newlib@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Dejagnu: use -isystem to include system header files.
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 09:15:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <419C6925.8010007@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1100713585.23221.6.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com>
Hi Richard,
> Nick Clifton wrote:
> I am going to check in the attached patch which imports a fix from
> the mainline dejagnu sources. This fix is to use the -isystem
> switch to include system header files rather than -I. This fixes
> several unexpected failures in the GCC and G++ testsuites where the
> newlib system header file <limits.h> is included in strict ANSI
> mode, and the compiler barfs on the #include_next directive.
>
> Unfortunately this patch causes regressions on the gcc builtins tests.
> These tests rely on detecting newlib by looking for the definition of
> _NEWLIB_VERSION being added by including limits.h; but the change in the
> search order means that we now pick up a dummy version of newlib.h from
> the gcc include directory.
>
> With your patch the search path has now become
>
> /work/rearnsha/gnu/egcs/gcc/include
> /work/rearnsha/gnu/egcs/arm-elf/./newlib/targ-include
> /home/rearnsha/gnusrc/egcs-cross/newlib/libc/include
>
> Whereas previously the gcc/include directory came later in the search.
Hmmm, maybe newlib could provide the "l" variants of the builtin
functions ? What are these functions anyway ? Or maybe
builtins-config.h could include say <stdio.h> rather than <limits.h> so
that it would pickup the newlib version and not the gcc version ?
Alternatively - can you think of another way of solving the problem that
my patch was originally fixing ? Namely that several GCC and G++ tests
fail because they include <limits.h> whilst in strict ANSI mode and this
fails because the newlib limits.h uses the GNU extension #include_next
directive. My first patch to solve this - by undefining __GNUC__ if
__STRICT_ANSI__ was defined was rejected on the gcc lists.
Cheers
Nick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-18 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-17 17:47 Richard Earnshaw
2004-11-18 9:15 ` Nick Clifton [this message]
2004-11-18 11:15 ` Richard Earnshaw
2004-11-18 15:56 ` Nick Clifton
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-11-18 20:07 Richard Earnshaw
2004-11-22 14:05 ` Nick Clifton
[not found] <m3pt2koaw8.fsf@redhat.com>
2004-11-11 14:22 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-11-11 15:54 ` Nick Clifton
2004-11-11 17:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-11-12 0:25 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2004-11-12 0:29 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-11-12 1:30 ` Zack Weinberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=419C6925.8010007@redhat.com \
--to=nickc@redhat.com \
--cc=binutils@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=newlib@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox