Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
To: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@gnu.org>
Cc: drow@false.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, ezannoni@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [rfa] Attach vsyscall support for GNU/Linux
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 14:28:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <41879955.10708@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200411012212.iA1MClCE000632@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl>

Mark Kettenis wrote:
>    Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 18:44:37 -0400
>    From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
> 
> Thos funny little diagrams are UML isn't it?
> 
>    It needs to be changed so more like:
> 
> 		       SYMBOL
> 			/|\
> 			 |
>        FRAME <>----- FUNCTION <>------ UNWINDER
> 
>    and have the FUNCTION provide:
> 
>       - signal trampoline?

In english:

frame has-a function
function has-a unwinder
function is-a symbol

> I think this is wrong.  It's probably true that functions that are
> used as signal trampolines in traditional UNIX systems are only usable
> as such, this is not true for interrupt handlers.  On i386 systems you
> can write interrupt handlers that are also usable as trap handlers.
> Where interrupt handlers are sigtramp-like, trap handlers are musch
> more normal.  This kind of attributes depend more on the context and
> thereforeit is more logical to put them in the frame.  I think the
> same is true for the unwinder.
> 
> That said, it is perfectly reasonable to let the frame inherit some of
> these attributes from the function.
> 
> Mark
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2004-11-02 14:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-10-24 18:53 Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-10-24 20:55 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-10-24 23:16   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-10-25 22:12     ` Mark Kettenis
2004-10-25 22:46       ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-01 22:13         ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-02 14:28           ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2004-11-01 16:15       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-11-01 20:45         ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-01 22:32           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-11-02 14:29             ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-07 21:35               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-11-08 16:40                 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-05 23:42           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-11-07 17:36             ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-07 21:18               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-11-07 21:34                 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-10-25 22:54     ` Andrew Cagney
2004-10-26  2:51     ` Roland McGrath
2004-10-26  8:17       ` Jakub Jelinek
2004-10-26 13:27         ` Daniel Jacobowitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=41879955.10708@gnu.org \
    --to=cagney@gnu.org \
    --cc=drow@false.org \
    --cc=ezannoni@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=kettenis@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox