From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
To: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@gnu.org>
Cc: drow@false.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, ezannoni@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [rfa] Attach vsyscall support for GNU/Linux
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 14:28:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41879955.10708@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200411012212.iA1MClCE000632@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 18:44:37 -0400
> From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
>
> Thos funny little diagrams are UML isn't it?
>
> It needs to be changed so more like:
>
> SYMBOL
> /|\
> |
> FRAME <>----- FUNCTION <>------ UNWINDER
>
> and have the FUNCTION provide:
>
> - signal trampoline?
In english:
frame has-a function
function has-a unwinder
function is-a symbol
> I think this is wrong. It's probably true that functions that are
> used as signal trampolines in traditional UNIX systems are only usable
> as such, this is not true for interrupt handlers. On i386 systems you
> can write interrupt handlers that are also usable as trap handlers.
> Where interrupt handlers are sigtramp-like, trap handlers are musch
> more normal. This kind of attributes depend more on the context and
> thereforeit is more logical to put them in the frame. I think the
> same is true for the unwinder.
>
> That said, it is perfectly reasonable to let the frame inherit some of
> these attributes from the function.
>
> Mark
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-02 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-24 18:53 Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-10-24 20:55 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-10-24 23:16 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-10-25 22:12 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-10-25 22:46 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-01 22:13 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-02 14:28 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2004-11-01 16:15 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-11-01 20:45 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-01 22:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-11-02 14:29 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-07 21:35 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-11-08 16:40 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-05 23:42 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-11-07 17:36 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-07 21:18 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-11-07 21:34 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-10-25 22:54 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-10-26 2:51 ` Roland McGrath
2004-10-26 8:17 ` Jakub Jelinek
2004-10-26 13:27 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41879955.10708@gnu.org \
--to=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=ezannoni@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=kettenis@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox