From: Orjan Friberg <orjan.friberg@axis.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: STEP_SKIPS_DELAY question, sort of
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 11:26:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <415D3EC2.80804@axis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40C73411.9060708@gnu.org>
Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
> Can a simple, separate, more explicit logic like:
> if (we just did a step and STEP_SKIPS_DELAY (pc))
> set up for another step
> return;
> work? The [handle_inferior_event patch snipped] was nested within other
> logic and that's not good from a readability / maintainability point of
> view.
Now that I've done a lot more testing, I'm picking this up again. (Below is
just the infrun.c part; gdbarch.sh obviously needs a patch, and mips-tdep.c
needs to have its current STEP_SKIPS_DELAY implementation converted - I'll post
a complete patch if this part is approved of.)
A few things:
* I'm not sure how to reliably detect the situation "stepping off a breakpoint"
in handle_inferior_event. I used stop_signal == TARGET_SIGNAL_TRAP &&
trap_expected && currently_stepping (ecs)); could that be too inclusive?.
* Distinguishing between "step" and "continue" (using step_range_end) is not
necessary for it to work, but explicitly returning in the "continue" case is
making things a bit clearer.
* As the comment suggests, in the "step" case we don't want to preclude the
stop_after_trap check - I assume that whatever is in the delay slot could
potentially correspond to a single line of code (if nothing else, then at least
an asm("...") construct.)
Index: infrun.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/infrun.c,v
retrieving revision 1.177
diff -u -r1.177 infrun.c
--- infrun.c 13 Sep 2004 18:26:28 -0000 1.177
+++ infrun.c 1 Oct 2004 11:22:42 -0000
@@ -721,17 +721,12 @@
if (read_pc () == stop_pc && breakpoint_here_p (read_pc ()))
oneproc = 1;
-
-#ifndef STEP_SKIPS_DELAY
-#define STEP_SKIPS_DELAY(pc) (0)
-#define STEP_SKIPS_DELAY_P (0)
-#endif
- /* Check breakpoint_here_p first, because breakpoint_here_p is fast
- (it just checks internal GDB data structures) and STEP_SKIPS_DELAY
- is slow (it needs to read memory from the target). */
- if (STEP_SKIPS_DELAY_P
- && breakpoint_here_p (read_pc () + 4)
- && STEP_SKIPS_DELAY (read_pc ()))
+
+ /* If we stepped into something that needs to be stepped again before
+ before re-inserting the breakpoint, then do so. */
+ else if (gdbarch_single_step_through_delay_p (current_gdbarch)
+ && gdbarch_single_step_through_delay (current_gdbarch,
+ get_current_frame ()))
oneproc = 1;
}
else
@@ -1793,6 +1788,35 @@
stopped_by_random_signal = 0;
breakpoints_failed = 0;
+ if (gdbarch_single_step_through_delay_p (current_gdbarch)
+ && stop_signal == TARGET_SIGNAL_TRAP && trap_expected
+ && currently_stepping (ecs))
+ {
+ /* We are in the process of stepping off a breakpoint. If we stepped
+ into something that needs to be stepped again before re-inserting
+ the breakpoint, then do so. */
+ int step_through_delay
+ = gdbarch_single_step_through_delay (current_gdbarch,
+ get_current_frame ());
+ if (step_range_end == 0 && step_through_delay)
+ {
+ /* The user issued a continue when stopped at a breakpoint.
+ Set up for another trap and get out of here. */
+ ecs->another_trap = 1;
+ keep_going (ecs);
+ return;
+ }
+ else if (step_through_delay)
+ {
+ /* The user issued a step when stopped at a breakpoint.
+ Maybe we should stop, maybe we should not - the delay slot
+ *might* correspond to a line of source. In any case, don't decide
+ that here, just set ecs->another_trap, making sure we
+ single-step again before breakpoints are re-inserted. */
+ ecs->another_trap = 1;
+ }
+ }
+
/* Look at the cause of the stop, and decide what to do.
The alternatives are:
1) break; to really stop and return to the debugger,
--
Orjan Friberg
Axis Communications
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-01 11:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-21 17:14 Orjan Friberg
2004-05-21 20:25 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-05-24 9:15 ` Orjan Friberg
2004-05-24 18:15 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-05-25 11:53 ` Orjan Friberg
2004-05-25 21:14 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-05-26 9:39 ` Orjan Friberg
2004-05-26 17:39 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-06-07 12:12 ` Orjan Friberg
2004-06-07 12:42 ` Orjan Friberg
2004-06-07 13:09 ` Orjan Friberg
2004-06-07 15:08 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-06-09 9:48 ` Orjan Friberg
2004-06-09 16:00 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-06-14 12:09 ` Orjan Friberg
2004-06-16 14:53 ` Orjan Friberg
2004-06-24 18:25 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-10-01 11:26 ` Orjan Friberg [this message]
2004-10-25 20:18 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=415D3EC2.80804@axis.com \
--to=orjan.friberg@axis.com \
--cc=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox