Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Chastain <mec.gnu@mindspring.com>
To: manjo@austin.ibm.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] GDB testsuite patch. (revised version)
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 14:48:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <412F49BA.nailEDT11A0NY@mindspring.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0408261009010.27764@lazy>

Ouch, copying the whole text of gdb_file_cmd is no good, either!
That much duplicate code is bad.

Here is my plan.

gdb_file_cmd has a return value.  None of the callers of gdb_file_cmd
uses the return vale, except for gdb_load, which simply returns the same
value.

There are about 300 callers of gdb_load.  Most of them don't use the
return value either.  The exceptions are:

  gdb.base/remote.exp
  gdb.base/sepdebug.exp
    # does not use the return value but it wants to
  gdb.gdb/complaints.exp
  gdb.gdb/observer.exp
  gdb.gdb/selftest.exp
  gdb.gdb/xfullpath.exp
  gdb.stabs/weird.exp
    # does not use the return value but it wants to
  lib/gdb.exp:
    proc gdb_run_cmd

So, I will do some infrastructure work: I will make gdb_load return
a better return value that includes more information, like a list
with more status information:

  success indicator
  whatever sepdebug.exp is looking for
  whatever weird.exp is looking for
  indicator of whether debug symbols found or not

While I am in there, I will see if I can get back any commonality
with mi_gdb_file_cmd.  But that's optional.

I expect to commit the new gdb_file_cmd sometime on Saturday.  After
that, it will be easy for you to change gdb.gdb/*.exp to just use the
new information in the return value from gdb_load.

Michael

2004-08-26  Manoj Iyer  <manjo@austin.ibm.com

        * lib/gdb.exp (gdb_check_debuginfo): New procedure
        * gdb.gdb/complaints.exp: check if gdb has debug information.
        * gdb.gdb/observer.exp: check if gdb has debug information.
        * gdb.gdb/selftest.exp: check if gdb has debug information.
        * gdb.gdb/xfullpath.exp: check if gdb has debug information.


  reply	other threads:[~2004-08-27 14:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.58.0408191014360.21237@lazy>
     [not found] ` <41251A45.nail58D215HD7@mindspring.com>
     [not found]   ` <Pine.LNX.4.58.0408191637370.21237@lazy>
     [not found]     ` <4125BB8B.nailJWP1FZGHJ@mindspring.com>
     [not found]       ` <Pine.LNX.4.58.0408242319060.7065@lazy>
     [not found]         ` <20040825124945.GA25217@nevyn.them.org>
     [not found]           ` <412C98BD.nail10P1YTPHK@mindspring.com>
2004-08-27  0:00             ` Manoj Iyer
2004-08-27 14:48               ` Michael Chastain [this message]
2004-08-27 15:28                 ` Manoj Iyer
2004-08-27 16:01                   ` Michael Chastain
2004-08-28  5:50                     ` Manoj Iyer
2004-08-28  5:48                   ` Manoj Iyer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=412F49BA.nailEDT11A0NY@mindspring.com \
    --to=mec.gnu@mindspring.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=manjo@austin.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox