From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
To: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: RFA: PowerPC sim & GDB: use fixed register numbering
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 17:33:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41111DEC.7080102@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <vt2vffyde1a.fsf@zenia.home>
> Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org> writes:
>
>>>> > Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org> writes:
>>>> >
>>>
>>>>>> >>> Have a look at the other sim-*.h files, you'll notice that most define
>>>>>> >>> an enum namespace and not a series of magic constants. Can we expand
>>>>>> >>> the table so that the constants aren't needed?
>>>
>>>> > Is this going in the right direction?
>>
>>>
>>> Yes, that should go in.
>
>
> Okay, committed. Thanks to you and Kevin for the review.
Ok,
> The old code, which did an under-the-covers call into gdb to map number -> name, was bad and definitly needed to be replaced. The above though could still do with some work - too much on the magic of those numbers in gdb/sim-ppc.h :-(
>
> Anyway, lets first get the enum in place.
Since we've nailed the enum, what should we do about the sim/ppc?
>>> What's your plan with SPRs?
>
>
> I think it's best to use the SPR numbers assigned by the ISA to
> identify them. Trying to keep tables based on automatically assigned
> enum values in sync would take a lot of work, for little gain, since
> ISA SPR numbers are (obviously) unambiguous within any particular PPC
> variant.
Which is a change from the status quo. That was doing things based on
the ISA's register name. Which ever.
> At the moment, the sim doesn't support any SPRs from different PPC
> variants whose numbers clash. There'll be work needed there to handle
> that; I don't have any particular insights there.
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-04 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-20 20:40 Jim Blandy
2004-07-23 23:12 ` Kevin Buettner
2004-08-03 14:23 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-04 5:47 ` Jim Blandy
2004-08-04 13:53 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-04 17:13 ` Jim Blandy
2004-08-04 17:33 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2004-08-04 17:56 ` Jim Blandy
2004-08-04 18:07 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-04 21:26 ` Jim Blandy
2004-08-05 0:18 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-05 15:22 ` Jim Blandy
2004-08-05 16:10 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41111DEC.7080102@gnu.org \
--to=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=jimb@redhat.com \
--cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox